X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 1D30E3898536
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com;
	s=default; t=1622475479;
	bh=7EjWP5RN/i55HDPySD2vC+uIgisAuBU/3HeSIyY1EvI=;
	h=References:In-Reply-To:Date:Subject:To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:
	List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc:
	From;
	b=Aldj/m0hXmboYCpxznGGB3D3NugDpcO5+SapfkEOVxIA8WyhiGAeIWmNOqLa3ghfh
	WFGVlzebg4lRZUqAJD8d/WW6KFFgeX02q0xJXvmFvvoxhNfDnUoGQojK3IVN2+y2NS
	1O2Iv3w7BuOsbl2Y7zC57yU8bTJQw8uvc2MaItyQ=
X-Original-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 8395C38515E6
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
	:message-id:subject:to:cc;
	bh=fOWs8z2lze5EL/nnA23eN2FgmdDtEePKx0WME+tc8MY=;
	b=GRd8/KeHPk59bJpKvI5mCagAkdDTO9WJSPzUWnbdLY+NsLkc22GlUcfng88G3tiC1N
	sbGipr5Sg60LtVub72XRP6ptqm2LBjknAFfWNMtruBa4lX8kQhLQqG7brU9IEYW0fG+P
	YlTQnnjzUvvPjSTj1UctHH5VHwTAVuujrfNSRE6eIvimQS1ZrovM3nIdMu3whZNcaaSq
	CrfPvc+hsxFDAKDphSQipLEkIkHJg0+xa9HfapMjvGd0ZAgt28dYPQ61JoOiVHrWILcK
	DmEvL9R+zrRM2/mecS4/Wx2V/kWUU9yS16Cqknqz6JrQjudF/w+Lqj2yPZyQbWudqrAU
	w/iw==
X-Gm-Message-State:	AOAM532TWiUjy8Nss05cOsXm0J44wvYO3OFINKvhsqdcWwOFqe2V/iD4
	2VmdERSxMbFSya3ONBfR6o/L2szqk8VgGyUmzz8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source:	ABdhPJxiyxB2myN7oGWx8jNnnLxnzvlfcp6mZz0CiE6RAlsvVp9O7sDS9qYRfUkJ2oXpQJ1FF24lvXESRc1mq35ATOU=
X-Received:	by 2002:a17:90a:bb13:: with SMTP id
	u19mr19649793pjr.95.1622475475624;
	Mon, 31 May 2021 08:37:55 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version:	1.0
References:	<announce.CAALQ5rm2xisVPE8WqJOWVxs4o9Qr0Cpcnqx=VybTeyFD005kxA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<87mtsx6six DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid> <87pmxe1rmk DOT fsf_-_ AT Rainer DOT invalid>
	<CAALQ5r=xF_y9cgMn2gRWR4tmvK4TQN-NHYSVx1CepW8NVp=yHg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<871r9thlw0 DOT fsf AT Otto DOT invalid>
In-Reply-To:	<871r9thlw0.fsf@Otto.invalid>
Date:	Mon, 31 May 2021 17:37:46 +0200
Message-ID:	<CAALQ5r=Zx3krUx_qw-c8-_4aEsEtS63kahCZo1GzfwXpDz2B0w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [Bug] tmux 3.2-0
To:	ASSI <Stromeko AT nexgo DOT de>
X-Spam-Status:	No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, KAM_NUMSUBJECT,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,
	TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version:	SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
	server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version:	2.1.29
List-Id:	General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Archive:	<https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
From:	Michael Wild via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To:	Michael Wild <themiwi AT gmail DOT com>
Cc:	The Cygwin Mailing List <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Sender:	"Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com>

On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 12:08 PM ASSI wrote:
>
> Michael Wild via Cygwin writes:
> > Sorry for the mistake with the release number. Should that be a sanity
> > check in calm?
>
> I personally don't think so, if you want to do a test / pre-release then
> starting with a "0" seems netural to me.
>
> > As for the problem with the control mode: Is there anything I can do?
>
> Since it's clearly a regression (on cygwin), it would be a start to
> check if any new warnings have popped up during compilation.
>
> > Like forwarding the problem to upstream? Or do you consider it to be
> > "unfixable" until Cygwin implements the control mode properly?
>
> I don't know, I haven't looked beyond the fact that
>
> tmux -C new
>
> doesn't give you any of the expected output and indefinitely hangs
> (although it seems to process at least some commands that you enter).  I
> still hope it might just be a misguided #ifdef targeting Cygwin or some
> simarly silly mistake.
>
>
> Regards,
> Achim.

I just tried the following:

Terminal 1:
$ tmux new -s mysession

Terminal 2:
$ tmux -C attach -t mysession
split-window
split-window -h

And as expected, in Terminal 1 the window got split first vertically,
then horizontally. However, in version 3.1b Terminal 2 was echoing the
commands from Terminal 1. This doesn't happen with version 3.2
anymore. I verified by building 3.2 in WSL 2 (Ubuntu 20.04) and there
the echoing does work.

Just out of curiosity: is this a critical feature for you? E.g. are
you automating tmux with it? Because as far as I understand control
mode is intended for integration with terminal emulators. And so far,
iTerm2 on Mac is the only one implementing the protocol.

Regards

Michael

-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -