X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 3E1803850438
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org;
	dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=nexgo.de
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org;
	spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=Stromeko AT nexgo DOT de
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nexgo.de;
	s=vfde-smtpout-mb-15sep; t=1622022131;
	bh=KOTTIX1hPd2PMTZo04pnzIaMHh/VMjl5mdel8wBFYCA=;
	h=From:To:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To;
	b=h6QBKf/97zRLvLcYiDNyBuZcePj4CdZZ27EHJwwoxhiz3kus7DvvJ+4SuxymlI8df
	pBXp4f/Jb/fNAfU5FlYQi5WhLXgg7TrIu0RrNcM8JYMZZHrPi38hWFEJYS/CHlwDU4
	r5mOBTa+xM6KGM5Hx9zBYa80eJBx0JYlWpNgsiGY=
From:	ASSI <Stromeko AT nexgo DOT de>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: [Bug] tmux 3.2-0
References:	<announce.CAALQ5rm2xisVPE8WqJOWVxs4o9Qr0Cpcnqx=VybTeyFD005kxA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<87mtsx6six DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid> <87pmxe1rmk DOT fsf_-_ AT Rainer DOT invalid>
	<CAALQ5r=xF_y9cgMn2gRWR4tmvK4TQN-NHYSVx1CepW8NVp=yHg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Date:	Wed, 26 May 2021 11:42:07 +0200
In-Reply-To:	<CAALQ5r=xF_y9cgMn2gRWR4tmvK4TQN-NHYSVx1CepW8NVp=yHg@mail.gmail.com>
	(Michael Wild via Cygwin's message of "Wed, 26 May 2021 08:34:26
	+0200")
Message-ID:	<871r9thlw0.fsf@Otto.invalid>
User-Agent:	Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-purgate-type:	clean
X-purgate-Ad:	Categorized by eleven eXpurgate (R) http://www.eleven.de
X-purgate:	This mail is considered clean (visit http://www.eleven.de for
	further information)
X-purgate:	clean
X-purgate-size:	1113
X-purgate-ID:	155817::1622022131-0000067D-9F93FD19/0/0
X-Spam-Status:	No, score=-3032.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, KAM_NUMSUBJECT, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,
	RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,
	TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version:	SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
	server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version:	2.1.29
List-Id:	General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive:	<https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To:	cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com
Sender:	"Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com>

Michael Wild via Cygwin writes:
> Sorry for the mistake with the release number. Should that be a sanity
> check in calm?

I personally don't think so, if you want to do a test / pre-release then
starting with a "0" seems netural to me.

> As for the problem with the control mode: Is there anything I can do?

Since it's clearly a regression (on cygwin), it would be a start to
check if any new warnings have popped up during compilation.

> Like forwarding the problem to upstream? Or do you consider it to be
> "unfixable" until Cygwin implements the control mode properly?

I don't know, I haven't looked beyond the fact that

tmux -C new

doesn't give you any of the expected output and indefinitely hangs
(although it seems to process at least some commands that you enter).  I
still hope it might just be a misguided #ifdef targeting Cygwin or some
simarly silly mistake.


Regards,
Achim.
-- 
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+

Factory and User Sound Singles for Waldorf rackAttack:
http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSounds

-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -