X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org E2BAD3896C29
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org;
	dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=towo.net
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=towo AT towo DOT net
Subject:	Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Test: {mingw64-{i686,x86_64}-,}gcc-11.1.0-0.1
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<announce DOT 871raewgfm DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid>
	<f3f9f296-cde2-1549-e7e9-38c1c855d5df AT towo DOT net>
	<87mtszzsvd DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid>
From:	Thomas Wolff <towo AT towo DOT net>
Message-ID:	<29a53ee2-cac3-6815-792d-36f96be47bd1@towo.net>
Date:	Thu, 13 May 2021 10:57:50 +0200
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
	Thunderbird/78.10.1
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<87mtszzsvd.fsf@Rainer.invalid>
X-Provags-ID:	V03:K1:6Cy8Z0TcLxw2JOHrA5L1XTKXb/2dbw9ora0h5Kz1O4cHVhMycVK
	05Qw3my6bARrQDlZkRuqfJBaliSpjbpT0Qxn6pi/ACvRKD+xDsWK05Bq180ku9w/VDjAUOY
	qsT3hyQv2whPtAJfTKvZacoe5+fUdZwnryXsZt/XwLz+yAKC4OQFaTI5AHAcuu7DXROSgZu
	zthsMLcbjvrlv7tbBD2MQ==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults:	notjunk:1;V03:K0:APBsiawKBIQ=:jjon8agokOMtm5FjBb2USP
	BaWSFt0QpIojYiVZO/IbVgcepdOEf/rB9qTUFwuMmMxtUpOTAHxyD9f1zq+AaqGrxjyS/TIo0
	FQLEhYESo9aaW4T+FzZvPqI4qmrz7X4BGU3/7gy833D82aww7SnDFcZQSzrMSZMMtntJqX2KG
	7aGasfK5M6ITlSWX/hUr9BwUbldxP7LY/r3C05j9KLNukavrDx0BYdlFj1mJ9LkdAxcOMueci
	TsL5L8G60U152SAwEV6xqT6v1x9gLrMpt5h/Nu2BqafzZABkW/tHBTC9LLIEh2O+XB42rpHtU
	hD+tf5VejdnBRfxg2e7LOJq0kNUCH4+xGqKr7E9bWvE+i6YKosCT4Yi48mTRQq3/qg1WqtUKw
	VHwDttBDQF+3tySG4pOVMJIN26A2xl7N4vW8z+vl11mKwFnmbQEkXT/fpeaocXaRVM6+0fg+T
	aPdH2IGrdaqdOhfAHfLRao2i8HZo/HVJ0it9NWHBAtV+cCFS6LpKnFy+eSiUJhn7/vCBg/VDK
	oBv3xr1KoO+x5p6sKE0a+o=
X-Spam-Status:	No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS,
	KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, KAM_NUMSUBJECT, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
	RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE,
	TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version:	SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
	server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version:	2.1.29
List-Id:	General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive:	<https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To:	cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com
Sender:	"Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com>

Am 12.05.2021 um 20:53 schrieb Achim Gratz:
> Thomas Wolff writes:
>> Am 10.05.2021 um 21:13 schrieb Achim Gratz:
>>> The native and mingw-w64 cross compilers have been updated for both
>>> architectures to the latest upstream release version:
>>>
>>>    gcc-11.1.0-0.1
>> Are there any known problems with gcc 11? My program crashes if
>> compiled with gcc -O2; gcc -O1 works, gcc 10 also works.
> None that I'd know of, especially given that very vague symptoms.  While
> I guess it's possible that there's a bug in the optimizer, I'd first
> attempt to rule out undefined behaviour in the program being compiled.
The crash vanishes after removing a few lines from a conditional (if 
block) where the condition is false.
This smells like wrong calculation of a relative jump (Intel "short 
jump") by the optimizer.

>
>
> Regards,
> Achim.


-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -