X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org CBB49395C819
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none)
	header.from=dronecode.org.uk
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org;
	spf=none smtp.mailfrom=jon DOT turney AT dronecode DOT org DOT uk
Authentication-Results:	btinternet.com;
	auth=pass (PLAIN) smtp.auth=jonturney AT btinternet DOT com
X-SNCR-Rigid:	5ED9C0CC30D9AD1A
X-Originating-IP:	[81.153.98.246]
X-OWM-Source-IP:	81.153.98.246 (GB)
X-OWM-Env-Sender:	jonturney AT btinternet DOT com
X-VadeSecure-score:	verdict=clean score=0/300, class=clean
X-RazorGate-Vade:	gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrvddvgedgudduudcutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemuceutffkvffkuffjvffgnffgvefqofdpqfgfvfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedtudenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhepuffvfhfhkffffgggjggtgfesthekredttdefjeenucfhrhhomheplfhonhcuvfhurhhnvgihuceojhhonhdrthhurhhnvgihsegurhhonhgvtghouggvrdhorhhgrdhukheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepteejfffhheeuleeufeeiueduveeltdeiveejuddvgfegjeeuheefgeffgeffheefnecuffhomhgrihhnpegthihgfihinhdrtghomhenucfkphepkedurdduheefrdelkedrvdegieenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhephhgvlhhopegludelvddrudeikedruddrudduudgnpdhinhgvthepkedurdduheefrdelkedrvdegiedpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpeeojhhonhdrthhurhhnvgihsegurhhonhgvtghouggvrdhorhhgrdhukhequceuqfffjgepkeeukffvoffkoffgpdhrtghpthhtohepoegthihgfihinhestgihghifihhnrdgtohhmqe
X-RazorGate-Vade-Verdict:	clean 0
X-RazorGate-Vade-Classification:	clean
Subject:	Re: Possible setup-x86_64 2.908 bugs?
To:	The Cygwin Mailing List <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<9604e283-fa0c-220f-a687-dbe3e5743452 AT jhmg DOT net>
From:	Jon Turney <jon DOT turney AT dronecode DOT org DOT uk>
Message-ID:	<a0488465-ca48-6e4a-a4db-f4708897f5b2@dronecode.org.uk>
Date:	Thu, 29 Apr 2021 18:10:15 +0100
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
	Thunderbird/78.10.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<9604e283-fa0c-220f-a687-dbe3e5743452@jhmg.net>
X-Spam-Status:	No, score=-3571.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, FORGED_SPF_HELO,
	KAM_DMARC_STATUS, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
	RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_NONE,
	TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version:	SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
	server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version:	2.1.29
List-Id:	General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive:	<https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To:	cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com
Sender:	"Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com>
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id 13THBRf7017881

On 29/04/2021 17:41, Jim Garrison via Cygwin wrote:
> I got the "newer version" prompt just now when running setup and
> downloaded 2.908 (I was on 2.905).
> 
> Now I'm seeing really flaky behavior in 2.908
> 
[...]
> 
> * "This version of setup is *older* than the one you used last time"


I guess the message here is "setup.ini is older than the one you used 
last time you installed cygwin."

This indicates that (setup thinks that) the timestamp in the retrieved 
setup.ini file has gone backwards.

(determined by comparing the value saved in /etc/setup/timestamp with 
that given by the setup-timestamp: line close to the beginning of setup.ini)

>   Does not happen the first time the new setup is launched, but then
>   occurs intermittently thereafter.  I saw that message on two
>   occasions, and the second time setup-x86_64.exe crashed a few
>   seconds later. No message, the window just closed after I dismissed
>   the message popup.
> 
>   Note: When I downloaded the new setup-x86_64.exe I overwrote the
>   old one, so there's no chance (barring an OS caching bug) I was
>   running 2.905 at that point.

There haven't really been any setup changes in the relevant area.

The only thing I can think of is that it's possible that your mirror URL 
might have been upgraded from http to https, which might effect how any 
proxy you are behind is working.

Some old setup versions are available at [1], if you want to downgrade.

[1] https://cygwin.com/setup/

-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -