X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 3B393395043F
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com;
	s=default; t=1619636496;
	bh=xWHIeW9WcVsiplKzj/JuAs90/Zrxm7klx43gfzWgCD8=;
	h=To:Subject:Date:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:
	List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:From;
	b=vpEQhFMwClqJvEWfK7Ltvm0MyjKvl2k+nJbhqwCU/TPwtFrbm06iFTH+OSNsriCji
	7tYUsL1F0sds8RNjujc99b1UMpJnA64NrEN4cxCJPYxrPJ/6fI7ETimKQKmLbNk9AQ
	8wJRyFa/yb3xO9RlqEW5y/Nl+TdNqXL+xvfzoAJs=
X-Original-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org D068A3943425
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Cygwin base install no longer has iconv binary
Date:	Wed, 28 Apr 2021 20:01:58 +0100
Message-ID:	<000001d73c60$f6d23fe0$e476bfa0$@cl.cam.ac.uk>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index:	Adc8X/7b+xlAvj+YRT2ezWVT4Dnhjw==
X-Scanned-By:	MIMEDefang 2.65 on 62.31.23.242
X-Smtpcorp-Track:	1_PpRD4ba9NxlX.iQEKgNuskmhHT
Feedback-ID:	614951m:614951apMmpqs:614951szc2ZMLGVZ
X-Report-Abuse:	Please forward a copy of this message, including all headers,
	to <abuse-report AT smtp2go DOT com>
X-Spam-Status:	No, score=1.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50, DKIMWL_WL_MED,
	DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_EF, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version:	SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
	server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version:	2.1.29
List-Id:	General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Archive:	<https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
From:	David Allsopp via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To:	David Allsopp <David DOT Allsopp AT cl DOT cam DOT ac DOT uk>
Sender:	"Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com>

[Continuing second point in
https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin-apps/2021-April/041212.html]

The man-db package prior to 2.9.3-1 on 3 Jan depended on the libiconv
package which, unusually, includes the iconv binary itself.

I noticed as OCaml has assumed since 2017 that iconv would be available in
base, and thus on "any" Cygwin installation. I was already working on
removing OCaml's dependency on the iconv binary, so I don't have a strong
opinion either way, but should libiconv be put in the Base category in order
to keep the installed commands consistent?


David


-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -