X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org AEE7F3968C3F
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com;
	s=default; t=1618854817;
	bh=SKAjr7rmWKcvUgAh0eufiaLig3lJpZrqf7hLMw0nFdU=;
	h=Date:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:
	List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc:
	From;
	b=knObSaHbgDu1KccTRXUJn7enhCE7HOdC9EBWWRBo11tBiluWWsrz3FSM2X1yEAnzY
	BztBgah4NaUxkIkWwMRc89heBEw3+AugWdU/csqbjHRknRB6vNQDPYal70tGMnQdVk
	7VGEw5Fxz8Gu8toCafoaHNYwqmd3rHO+V1hIsfNc=
X-Original-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 2C42F3851C1B
Date:	Mon, 19 Apr 2021 19:53:24 +0200
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: should scanf be getting built supporting hexadecimal float
Message-ID:	<YH3DlGS5dTWAcA2d@calimero.vinschen.de>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<CAAHpriMYTdJo5qFkN1y97wZVdx-ZkuggNrxHijiZdROwY_OEFg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<189e0004-0cee-0e1d-2c2f-0acd7d8ca2fb AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca>
	<91cf4bdd-9a97-6d6b-73af-01e891c22182 AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<91cf4bdd-9a97-6d6b-73af-01e891c22182@SystematicSw.ab.ca>
X-Provags-ID:	V03:K1:Q+GgaKwNCeO9wEkXqv226zHOJVOJam0NhCmvJ9KFuhJha5WYxQh
	HHuvS9vP9xK7r2HLT71lpn6gIRZ0P2Sej8Yrwvzc+0e6zDclpykum/3VrUCzEaj0TGTcP83
	d2HIcL3JboXWMnS0JKiskdLHRrI9XtShy9po+sYeAgeCW0uVrd8cDQavo96cJp3wLe59ct1
	NNImQ7pZh1pnufJJCbSvw==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults:	notjunk:1;V03:K0:MfVBAuuUuQw=:s8zSOjeHbziw+LPB5XLTKW
	NqkJ+KsWByr8OVj4bX12qUG08fm9EVI6P3WXFeIHG9A4oCSXKTbbGXu3Yw6GZbgWATOQ8gfJk
	lAx5ZdS51x9ZdMztgDPQKc0HGYjFWX1jQYdpahgpnPXUpNqJIaSP3mQvDprXD6DNYu9Y3ytja
	gKUgPiTOKx3+USeY5nObSHf+jWOMHGY0oVGrv9JNkACelV+OD/yBbExtY91ajOFSfiwB8SF0H
	3rhWQTiWl8Mf/rpmY8Ucn6+N5r1LQDcQ97flqT12VBuSfzTL2TBIcv+fXDbCXZQB0zbtEXfg+
	dQz29woxfYhsZ/jEc3Ztrfw/96kV7wzc2d6yW3eQEPvw1Hy8tdurT2f2DuXsx1uKnsKhM4htg
	VwN8EiO6zNPS2X0TEcMJdd5gJIIhECRAQTJfD44aGOpIsWanpmAEAdOA9djGuoOcJEsoI3vPD
	7gL5/m7x+J19wJouAh0hS3VYRpQ+6VOOIa2XcX/kbik7rB7w7yJKOve3s562V4gmatnqN/Gum
	xndKr2/8ZZHQXIDvQTquYo=
X-Spam-Status:	No, score=-100.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	GOOD_FROM_CORINNA_CYGWIN, JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL, KAM_DMARC_NONE, KAM_DMARC_STATUS,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NEUTRAL,
	TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version:	SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
	server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version:	2.1.29
List-Id:	General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive:	<https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
From:	Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Cc:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Errors-To:	cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com
Sender:	"Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com>

On Apr 19 09:17, Brian Inglis wrote:
> On 2021-04-19 09:07, Brian Inglis wrote:
> > On 2021-04-18 22:09, Keith Thompson via Cygwin wrote:
> > > The *scanf() functions don't handle hexadecimal floating-point input
> > > (for example "0x1p+0" representing 1.0).
> > > On Cygwin, the output (compiled with gcc or clang) is:
> > > sscanf returned 1, x = 0 (expected 1), FAILED
> > > On Ubuntu, the output is:
> > > sscanf returned 1, x = 1, PASSED
> > > Looking through the newlib sources (git://sourceware.org/git/newlib-cygwin.git),
> > > this might be related to the _WANT_IO_C99_FORMATS macro, but I haven't
> > > looked into
> > > the details.
> > > The test case passes on Cygwin when compiled with i686-w64-mingw32-gcc
> > > or x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc.
> 
> > This seems like an oversight as gdtoa-gethex.c was added about 2006 and
> > scanf and strtod support it.
> > See augmented STC with strtod added attached:
> > 
> > $ gcc -o hexfloat-scanf-test{,.c}
> > $ ./hexfloat-scanf-test
> > sscanf returned 2, unscanned 'x1p+0', x = 0 (expected 1), FAILED
> > strtod unscanned '', x = 1, PASSED
> 
> Should the Cygwin newlib build be enabling hex float support?

Unfortunately, newlib's scanf code does not support hex floats at all yet.
Scanf collects and validates the input stream snippet which is supposed to
be given to strtod/strtold, and neither x nor p are valid chars in that
piece of code yet.

I'll look into adding this code, which shouldn't be too complicated,
but I wouldn't be offended by patches either.


Thanks,
Corinna
--
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -