delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-Original-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
DMARC-Filter: | OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org A47123857C4C |
Authentication-Results: | sourceware.org; |
dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=tlinx.org | |
Authentication-Results: | sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cygwin AT tlinx DOT org |
Message-ID: | <606AD7CE.6090606@tlinx.org> |
Date: | Mon, 05 Apr 2021 02:26:38 -0700 |
From: | L A Walsh <cygwin AT tlinx DOT org> |
User-Agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | Joel Rees <joel DOT rees AT gmail DOT com> |
Subject: | Re: Perl Unidecode modules - which to use (if not Text::Unidecode)? |
References: | <d3342ff4-f717-f882-5c41-b27ab272dc03 AT cyberXpress DOT co DOT nz> |
<CAAr43iOdVea3YYThgdYpJxRCaVtFVhyHz_FwMTQhqTw8+YT-zg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
In-Reply-To: | <CAAr43iOdVea3YYThgdYpJxRCaVtFVhyHz_FwMTQhqTw8+YT-zg@mail.gmail.com> |
X-Spam-Status: | No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, BODY_8BITS, |
KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, | |
TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 | |
X-Spam-Checker-Version: | SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on |
server2.sourceware.org | |
X-BeenThere: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
X-Mailman-Version: | 2.1.29 |
List-Id: | General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Archive: | <https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help> |
List-Subscribe: | <https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>, |
<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe> | |
Cc: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Sender: | "Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com> |
X-MIME-Autoconverted: | from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id 1359QmJR009410 |
On 2021/04/04 14:26, Joel Rees via Cygwin wrote: > >> 1. What perl Unicode modules should I consider, if not Text::Unidecode? >> The present need >> is to be able to convert those few "foreign" characters (like >> ÇĆĈĊçĉċĜĞĠĢĝģğġËÌÍÎÏÒÓÔÕ) >> that are basically ASCII with accent marks to their closest ASCII >> equivalents, but I'd >> like to do more with Unicode in the future, without going down any >> dead-ends as far as >> being able to run under cygwin is concerned. >> >> > > "Stripping those few foreign accent characters" is probably not really what > you want to do. > ---- Why not? You don't know his use case and you are misinterpreting his example as random garbage. Those aren't a random foreign encoding -- those are C's G's then E, I O with accent variations that he may want to collapse for purposes of storing in a text storage and retrieval (search) application. They are all well formed/well-coded UTF-8 characters -- they are not some 8-bit encoding that was remangled during a no-recoding display of them in a UTF-8 context. I didn't know about Text::Unidecode -- but it specifically to create Latinized alternatives to foreign characters. That was another hint that it wasn't a random mistake. The manpage for it says: It often happens that you have non-Roman text data in Unicode, but you can't display it -- usually because you're trying to show it to a user via an application that doesn't support Unicode, or because the fonts you need aren't accessible. You could represent the Unicode characters as "???????" or "\15BA\15A0\1610...", but that's nearly useless to the user who actually wants to read what the text says. An example was like: tperl use utf8; use Text::Unidecode; my $name="\x{5317}\x{4EB0}"; printf "name, %s == %s\n", $name, unidecode($name); ' name, 北亰 == Bei Jing It's not just about removing accents but getting an English like translation based on the foreign text. All of the characters he used as example were well coded utf-8 characters -- > Those "accent characters" are misinterpreted foreign encoding (likely not > to be Unicode) characters. Simply "stripping" the "accent characters" will > basically convert them to truly meaningless junk. I suppose the meaningless > junk can then be interpreted by the reader as "used to be a be a foreign > word here", but why bother contributing further to information entropy? > > 2. I see some talk of Internationalization in Chapter 2 of "Setting up > >> Cygwin", but >> cannot see anything relating to perl modules, and I don't see any easy way >> to search many >> months of the mailing list for a keyword... is there any information I >> should know about? >> > > > Have you read the perldoc on internationalization? > -- > Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html > FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ > Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html > Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > > -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |