X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 69646382E801
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com;
	s=default; t=1614858630;
	bh=VA4r8dcTtuSG1VA9t25yZKp39GzpfvG0ncozghCrq10=;
	h=Date:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:
	List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:
	From;
	b=kBRnDr7y/4+/LxRstC5hxznL6+YbqxhQ4HqyFe+hN3AQ7pdgecwSHPH7pAd0JMNU+
	EuOSGviiYnEMITHS2kMb5T1iVwAOiK1GTpWHMbPObs+q+eg064kECC03cted740AR5
	Hh91V1PBnhOK29v6TVu+MFEGSgAimMcqBIalzL7Y=
X-Original-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 0FAA63840C0C
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 conssluserg-01.nifty.com 124Bnxav028161
X-Nifty-SrcIP:	[118.243.85.178]
Date:	Thu, 4 Mar 2021 20:50:00 +0900
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: segfault on 32bit cygwin snapshot
Message-Id:	<20210304205000.4ac34afe1a8b767ea2986291@nifty.ne.jp>
In-Reply-To:	<CAB8Xom-HwxH9LnbLL8cAoXh60tjU592T6XFEDJzvhv28Do-UsQ@mail.gmail.com>
References:	<9d7b9dc2-cb92-498b-7655-e9c618114c87 AT gmail DOT com>
	<20210221072954 DOT db2dcbd523ed366e4dfcb0d0 AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
	<7480c946-8e02-aba2-c06f-6b39f630699f AT gmail DOT com>
	<20210301095546 DOT dce31a474bd0cec2c3518f87 AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
	<20210301212542 DOT 8b1749f92af62c01b008f25a AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
	<20210302200308 DOT 62db4fe01f78fb35a538784f AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
	<YD5eXbxBWbUUSwcM AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
	<20210303185621 DOT b048287526901af6a4c8200a AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
	<YD9sSea32T7GqlJr AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
	<20210304180534 DOT 7c3825e6ee989a2bf62f0652 AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
	<CAB8Xom-HwxH9LnbLL8cAoXh60tjU592T6XFEDJzvhv28Do-UsQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
X-Mailer:	Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.30; i686-pc-mingw32)
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Spam-Status:	No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
	SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version:	SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
	server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version:	2.1.29
List-Id:	General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive:	<https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
From:	Takashi Yano via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To:	Takashi Yano <takashi DOT yano AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
Errors-To:	cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com
Sender:	"Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com>

On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 12:11:11 +0100
marco atzeri wrote:
> I have no problem to patch Python to solve the issue,
> but I have not seen evidence of the dlsym mechanism .
> But of course I an NOT and expert in this field.
> 
> If someone looking to the code can give me some hints,
> I will appreciate

I am also not sure where the dlsym() is used in python.
At least, os.uname() works in python 3.8.7 and 2.7.18 in my
environment even without that snippet. It seems that os.uname()
does not use dlsym(). Do I overlook something?

-- 
Takashi Yano <takashi DOT yano AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
--
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -