X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org C2F86386F032
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none)
	header.from=SystematicSw.ab.ca
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org;
	spf=none smtp.mailfrom=brian DOT inglis AT systematicsw DOT ab DOT ca
X-Authority-Analysis:	v=2.4 cv=Yq/K+6UX c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=600b611a
	a=kiZT5GMN3KAWqtYcXc+/4Q==:117 a=kiZT5GMN3KAWqtYcXc+/4Q==:17
	a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=iMpC6L0jGsNNbTZxuiUA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10
Subject:	Re: Random question: plans for Wayland support?
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<DB7PR02MB3996BD055A4C345EDE573E16E7A00 AT DB7PR02MB3996 DOT eurprd02 DOT prod DOT outlook DOT com>
From:	Brian Inglis <Brian DOT Inglis AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca>
Organization:	Systematic Software
Message-ID:	<9d4608f1-a291-5f9e-3c10-f8ab3ded574e@SystematicSw.ab.ca>
Date:	Fri, 22 Jan 2021 16:34:49 -0700
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
	Thunderbird/78.6.1
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<DB7PR02MB3996BD055A4C345EDE573E16E7A00@DB7PR02MB3996.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com>
X-CMAE-Envelope:	MS4xfDyFgDkYRdZxebxR3gYb2qIalnctNFNx3zd7zOY/rxVuG4x26KWgwBEaLqg0qG4eLirGDCCLeQMU58YGWGjsVk4FLE+I5+C17jrjqMaVg1v2RabD/xVU
	c0NQeuaMvKl/WmOerEVPBpn/l+Il+xI+dIeI/fdnItZ+NYOoTO68pUnPkc1XwWxAs3InVtoISccIEebIfpmXDPSucHEe/fE2z9c=
X-Spam-Status:	No, score=-5.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS,
	KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,
	RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE,
	TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version:	SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
	server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version:	2.1.29
List-Id:	General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive:	<https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Errors-To:	cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com
Sender:	"Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com>

On 2021-01-22 03:02, Hamish McIntyre-Bhatty via Cygwin wrote:
> Kind of a random question, but are there potential plans to supporting
> running Wayland under Cygwin as an alternative to X11?
> 
> I have no idea if it would even be practical/possible to do this, but
> just curious.

The standard answer here is: are you interested and offering to do it? SHTDI

-- 
Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

This email may be disturbing to some readers as it contains
too much technical detail. Reader discretion is advised.
[Data in binary units and prefixes, physical quantities in SI.]
--
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -