X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 73572386EC4F
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org;
	dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=nexgo.de
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org;
	spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=Stromeko AT nexgo DOT de
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nexgo.de;
	s=vfde-smtpout-mb-15sep; t=1610439584;
	bh=F7ICU5tpTne/Vo2AURKdSkd1t9OsePzqD/D/8cWjHvI=;
	h=From:To:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To;
	b=HDg21YbtGq3FXle4sgj33GWIZIwB3C+jRVKMsIBJbf65DtcmMEEFTcp15QWtv+gNZ
	eYeq1OmKWljjcMfCrRUBmJcmoc+yMEIK1QQH/xUeuez8hAiVYWpC3LmTQkp5W9Sfw9
	eDg2K974J792orTlZLeJ8r9c/foe7YPbqXSMDuUs=
From:	ASSI <Stromeko AT nexgo DOT de>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: tar 1.33 symlinks : Cannot change mode to...
References:	<PU1PR04MB25507BD8BECC57FABE96DC8590AB0 AT PU1PR04MB2550 DOT apcprd04 DOT prod DOT outlook DOT com>
	<1dff3bac-a82e-f30a-a86d-a4dcc08c849b AT cornell DOT edu>
Date:	Tue, 12 Jan 2021 09:18:56 +0100
In-Reply-To:	<1dff3bac-a82e-f30a-a86d-a4dcc08c849b@cornell.edu> (Ken Brown via
	Cygwin's message of "Mon, 11 Jan 2021 18:50:33 -0500")
Message-ID:	<87ft36k1ov.fsf@Otto.invalid>
User-Agent:	Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-purgate-type:	clean
X-purgate-Ad:	Categorized by eleven eXpurgate (R) http://www.eleven.de
X-purgate:	This mail is considered clean (visit http://www.eleven.de for
	further information)
X-purgate:	clean
X-purgate-size:	994
X-purgate-ID:	155817::1610439584-00005EB2-FFB0E732/0/0
X-Spam-Status:	No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,
	RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,
	TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version:	SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
	server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version:	2.1.29
List-Id:	General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive:	<https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To:	cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com
Sender:	"Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com>

Ken Brown via Cygwin writes:
> I can confirm this.  Running the tar command under gdb shows a problem
> at gnu/fchmodat.c:94:
>
> 94            if (S_ISLNK (st.st_mode))

That should be foolproof, but apparently isn't.

> Here st is a stat structure for directory/1, so S_ISLNK() should be
> true.  It is indeed true on 64-bit Cygwin but not on 32-bit Cygwin.
> Someone needs to look more closely and find out why this happened.
> I'll try to do it tomorrow if no one beats me to it.

I might remember wrongly, but I don't think that code was changed
between the two versions.  What's the call stack at that point?

Unfortunately the handful of commits that might change the behaviour for
this situation elsewhere are knotty, so bisecting will not really
help much I'm afraid.



Regards,
Achim.
-- 
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+

Wavetables for the Terratec KOMPLEXER:
http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#KomplexerWaves
--
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -