X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 78C473851C34
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com;
	s=default; t=1608461748;
	bh=uqDCNgLj3XAXoM1cpw+murmfzGH3DyBKq983gjEEFqc=;
	h=Subject:To:References:Date:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:
	List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:
	From;
	b=fW0mIh17E1uV/pJPYztdf9BMq1BGsP3SMGH2LZ6cA1xkfL9RYFFjRLugGAfeusk11
	88vt2sLLOxTSJNwi6i4T8SuRdyDhrRrsmxXOwTPtOj29/sYgsWY4NPpkx9kturPMbg
	fApCJ2EJLMhWxP0QDKIvwhZA9yD5ItLnGs1ak5+0=
X-Original-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 827153858018
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
	h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language
	:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=B3xnrzfyIX/46jgpz01q9zNx0jwLLa+CBU50//y+RFg=;
	b=fQRRS1XaiSRTZZD68mLkvW2olvkaWhvWg6+RGHSITF0AOUNH452OLfgRVlHvS1+kUO
	kA00UhC0+FUIK6hF9Y4M3Ja9rIg3LrHjsux9zzCeqscc8BmHnDL96pGz3gZqcpv6uQMa
	YXtUJ/eHx4bk7P4S8275yL8F1KU3fI0U5GVMkQiu7bKvrCfvuIIjuLw/hsaHf8TKuWF6
	rqVetUen7jh5wa2GdnZme96IY6ibPEqfaDnRZqyX8inGdmMC4Uu3qfRJXWW0RzZjNNsU
	F2alft21opZfEfr+5QOiKoRYCh/BC1X3JKRkgPFugNCjiqLu+0apnMpsP2APho+D2eIR
	gGag==
X-Gm-Message-State:	AOAM533jl05G0bdH7OAFDm16cS+XVHiV1LB0CG3m2zWUVE6SOGzA0J3E
	7hNZRqZ/OspUEu4wGLhMuE1bSX2vsgZNdQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source:	ABdhPJzj+pGdYpvsyHt4APqIyWQp3E1OaMB1NjIBXLmWWaMSYJTgfKwH/sGFEINDWKMXDcFgek9u/w==
X-Received:	by 2002:a17:906:3094:: with SMTP id
	20mr11184811ejv.218.1608461744296;
	Sun, 20 Dec 2020 02:55:44 -0800 (PST)
Subject:	Re: New version of GLM package?
To:	=?UTF-8?Q?Hans-Bernhard_Br=c3=b6ker?= <HBBroeker AT t-online DOT de>,
	"cygwin AT cygwin DOT com" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<CADt95779uyVv8arKz5s4tAW30KyEvF2v-uXd_b2d1Z0nxgjhzA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<952b6ef0-9d45-a53b-90b5-af03b0457c43 AT gmail DOT com>
	<c4b93792-f966-70c3-864c-a70749d0ac60 AT gmail DOT com>
	<e77a06df-f1b8-6ae9-b808-592c54784ab2 AT t-online DOT de>
Message-ID:	<5522d0a1-aa4c-50d2-4132-18435ef48d00@gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 20 Dec 2020 11:55:43 +0100
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
	Thunderbird/78.6.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<e77a06df-f1b8-6ae9-b808-592c54784ab2@t-online.de>
X-Spam-Status:	No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, NICE_REPLY_A,
	RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,
	TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version:	SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
	server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version:	2.1.29
List-Id:	General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive:	<https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
From:	Marco Atzeri via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To:	Marco Atzeri <marco DOT atzeri AT gmail DOT com>
Errors-To:	cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com
Sender:	"Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com>
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id 0BKAuF5M032043

back on the mailing list

On 20.12.2020 00:23, Hans-Bernhard Bröker wrote:
> Am 19.12.2020 um 19:21 schrieb Marco Atzeri via Cygwin:
> 
>> for what I can see upstream has completely removed the install
>> section from the cmake files on 0.9.9.8 .
>>
>> unclear why they performed such issue.
> 
> Possibly because there isn't all that much to install for a "library" 
> that does not actually contain any compiled files, because it consists 
> of nothing but inlined templates in header files.
> 
> I.e. the binary package would just be a subset of the source in a 
> different place.
> 
> They seem to assume that the cmake script snippet they offer is 
> sufficient to make the package count as "installed", because that (with 
> an environment variable on top) allows the package to be found by CMake 
> packages.  The canonical method would probably be a CPack package.

Hi Hans,

I have impression debian is using such assumption and copy just the
files in the proper place.
It is annoying anyway.

The fact that the github repository seems to not have the "issues"
is another annoying problem of this package.

Regards
Marco





--
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -