X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 22C0F3857C65
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none)
	header.from=huarp.harvard.edu
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org;
	spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=allen AT huarp DOT harvard DOT edu
Subject:	Re: Unix Domain Socket Limitation?
To:	Ken Brown <kbrown AT cornell DOT edu>, cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<71490665-31b0-f63c-74da-461a053fac21 AT huarp DOT harvard DOT edu>
	<55ea1649-1979-6238-75ab-69100c22e069 AT cornell DOT edu>
	<4260ad1b-4ab2-fa36-fd0e-7c9644560114 AT huarp DOT harvard DOT edu>
	<38a82f82-1ef9-768e-7d3e-15f63147e188 AT cornell DOT edu>
	<a1f6e9af-7c0b-4d3f-4198-1c7bff4869dc AT huarp DOT harvard DOT edu>
	<16165727-f614-1543-70bc-36457ddbf260 AT cornell DOT edu>
	<75d1315b-5a56-a2e5-310d-6ac33a3cf17c AT huarp DOT harvard DOT edu>
	<f5373cd4-1d3e-500a-a967-1c558541e720 AT cornell DOT edu>
	<85c9c70f-c016-0f88-099e-5c772adbc648 AT huarp DOT harvard DOT edu>
	<fb523694-7775-1d7a-db55-27ccbd6d157c AT huarp DOT harvard DOT edu>
	<1a0944b7-5924-31ab-7198-a5c311f39e06 AT huarp DOT harvard DOT edu>
	<1c1e875a-40a0-ff9e-a119-ba77203e43ea AT cornell DOT edu>
	<a13ab85d-bee7-71e3-41d0-1a67422a859f AT huarp DOT harvard DOT edu>
	<816668c9-4848-caa8-7fae-349be2cd5ab7 AT cornell DOT edu>
From:	Norton Allen <allen AT huarp DOT harvard DOT edu>
Message-ID:	<de5e7b33-405f-c62d-8800-674b121cd87e@huarp.harvard.edu>
Date:	Sun, 6 Dec 2020 12:17:22 -0500
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
	Thunderbird/78.5.1
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<816668c9-4848-caa8-7fae-349be2cd5ab7@cornell.edu>
X-Spam-Status:	No, score=-3.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS,
	NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,
	TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version:	SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
	server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version:	2.1.29
List-Id:	General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive:	<https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To:	cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com
Sender:	"Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com>
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id 0B6NeIft000987

On 12/5/2020 6:52 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
> On 12/4/2020 8:51 AM, Norton Allen wrote:
>> On 12/3/2020 8:11 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm traveling at the moment and unable to do any testing, but I 
>>> wonder if you're bumping into an issue that was just discussed on 
>>> the cygwin-developers list:
>>>
>>> https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin-developers/2020-December/012015.html 
>>>
>>>
>>> A different workaround is described there.
>>>
>>> If it's the same issue, then I don't think it will happen with the 
>>> new AF_UNIX implementation.  More in a few days.
>>>
>> It does seem related.
>>
>> A work around that is working for me is to do a blocking connect() 
>> and switch to non-blocking when that completes. In my application, 
>> the connect() generally occurs once at the beginning of a run, so 
>> blocking for a few milliseconds does not impact responsiveness.
>
> For the record, I can confirm that (a) the problem occurs with the 
> current AF_UNIX implementation and (b) it does not occur with the new 
> implementation (on the topic/af_unix branch).  With both client1 and 
> client2, I see "connect() apparently succeeded immediately" using the 
> new implementation.
>
> The new implementation is not yet ready for prime time, but with any 
> luck it might be ready within a few months.
>
That sounds great, and exactly like the behavior under Linux. I'd 
certainly be happy to test the new implementation as it gets closer, and 
also happy to expand or improve the test apps to cover a wider range of 
functionality and/or usability (e.g. run both client and server via a 
fork.) Feel free to let me know what would be particularly useful.


--
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -