X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org BE89938708B2
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org;
	dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=towo.net
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=towo AT towo DOT net
Subject:	Re: Failed assertion dialog box ATTN: Takashi Yano
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20201114034504 DOT GD2905 AT dimstar DOT local DOT net>
	<CAH5rLZV+T7u_u6TgivKA7y2RmBJiySVuUsxPVJQjLsEYoN91_A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20201115044613 DOT GE2905 AT dimstar DOT local DOT net>
	<CAH5rLZV25Z1EcrputHDswkuFRSVi8XJ+oJx5RaR3rYvawqay9w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<DM5PR19MB098611D7A5F52EE51A7918B693E40 AT DM5PR19MB0986 DOT namprd19 DOT prod DOT outlook DOT com>
	<DM5PR19MB0986B3BF7499FE71262677FB93E40 AT DM5PR19MB0986 DOT namprd19 DOT prod DOT outlook DOT com>
	<DM5PR19MB0986D551BC9C6DAD28463FC193E00 AT DM5PR19MB0986 DOT namprd19 DOT prod DOT outlook DOT com>
	<6d8262e3-4206-a05b-5252-f77bef27b0db AT towo DOT net>
	<20201120000658 DOT GL2905 AT dimstar DOT local DOT net>
	<20201120091929 DOT 55e86d995ae3edf925f1fd7a AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
	<20201120020452 DOT GA7078 AT dimstar DOT local DOT net>
From:	Thomas Wolff <towo AT towo DOT net>
Message-ID:	<07b951a1-127c-4164-ae72-193d56c6e9ad@towo.net>
Date:	Fri, 20 Nov 2020 08:09:28 +0100
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
	Thunderbird/78.4.3
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20201120020452.GA7078@dimstar.local.net>
X-Provags-ID:	V03:K1:lQmBYktcahdTdp8dB0ahGRRCDdFB+oAkIvABclxj6Gos1mrLJfU
	VCFVjnLwyVmL8TG+Ny9lNBskertXtcwgBiEh336MTzfSgaXkDbUmKgG1mwbJWHsYLZjIpNW
	8Ue7sEYPHqizRxxhl/oGz2mfzuCcC8rB+6h8VjP7DO2WdobzSPThTGuCVqUpHAk2FY6+5kx
	y+AhUEAVt/XixgQbGUIPw==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults:	notjunk:1;V03:K0:V6fkvbWXYXc=:5jsRr3ILmm6oGNNjdONoKu
	DeDGI4jAJNpgj+1NdygSDFZ3fCjkcQE0C1Rku64HKwWjgYd4u3O43x9Lmv/hmwPB2pKpdcyLY
	WLgK9LiUNozJs2ZRFLihAv5AMp5d68Zkbytzdcze1mfYgF0w2dtk6PE6kU8gBCvZmxgg3DTrH
	DFSf+yiYpLUR52gNI6G6wcoXgUElI3a+cxiY0ce13iRz2e2nRvp2yE0B5bWhrZBMSa5aZYh7o
	RE6oC0d9j/RU+pVcu2yY1NkE8WBJH6NFzGo9WvlUk+XdOnnHPLPMRrNbWQN5ocomYxzVSHg73
	kLpxXM8KcamC1Swpl9n9EqDkntQwiK9RNislo4fG9G29Tj+forxVzc0z/3usvhSKJ648sIaYm
	eMyfk0y4NmHDaIkm5cre3lzIO4+PO2AvksIRVmAXZGE31+yOA8EE1gjh/Yewj
X-Spam-Status:	No, score=1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS,
	KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,
	RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE,
	TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Level:	*
X-Spam-Checker-Version:	SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
	server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version:	2.1.29
List-Id:	General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive:	<https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To:	cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com
Sender:	"Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com>

Am 20.11.2020 um 03:04 schrieb Duncan Roe:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 09:19:29AM +0900, cygwin wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 11:06:58 +1100
>> Duncan Roe wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 07:30:20PM +0100, Thomas Wolff wrote:
>>>> It does not seem to happen in xterm which is weird.
>>> It happens in an xterm for me.
>>> xterm is /dev/pty1 and mintty is /dev/pty0. They both do it.
>>> So I think it has to be pseudo-console.
>>> (xterm has DISPLAY set to a Linux system but that shouldn't matter should it?)
>> Could you please try latest cygwin snapshot?
>>
>> --
>> Takashi Yano <takashi DOT yano AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
> Tried 20200909 - no popup
Still interesting, though, is this observation:
the message text in the popup is different from the text if it appears 
in the terminal, suggesting that cygwin function __assert_func (from 
winsup/cygwin/assert.cc) is somehow injected into the gcc runtime in the 
popup cases only, which raises the technical questions how it could be 
injected at all and why only in some cases.
Thomas
--
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -