X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 5EE6A3858D37
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none)
	header.from=SystematicSw.ab.ca
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org;
	spf=none smtp.mailfrom=brian DOT inglis AT systematicsw DOT ab DOT ca
X-Authority-Analysis:	v=2.4 cv=NYRYa0P4 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=5f9ee7ae
	a=kiZT5GMN3KAWqtYcXc+/4Q==:117 a=kiZT5GMN3KAWqtYcXc+/4Q==:17
	a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=aOIQUZmZLsIYzoo0jcsA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10
Subject:	Re: Cygwin-64 on W10-64 : the only game in town?
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<DB6PR03MB3013DBA0036A6A7F77F90A0BA4130 AT DB6PR03MB3013 DOT eurprd03 DOT prod DOT outlook DOT com>
	<20201101090012 DOT GA3058 AT dimstar DOT local DOT net>
	<CANnLRdh9Npgsw2eSdutUJd+2xVtW23bsbCnUx_42Cz=MdRkCmQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
From:	Brian Inglis <Brian DOT Inglis AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca>
Organization:	Systematic Software
Message-ID:	<a214df57-d50a-74bc-0941-6b8634798ea7@SystematicSw.ab.ca>
Date:	Sun, 1 Nov 2020 09:51:56 -0700
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
	Thunderbird/78.4.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<CANnLRdh9Npgsw2eSdutUJd+2xVtW23bsbCnUx_42Cz=MdRkCmQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-CMAE-Envelope:	MS4xfL8MwFH6/BprIlR21pHQ9yPLt/k9zTFZi174qaazaEhkW5cTUeoXeMa6a9vJLVmfVfIq7MZWbnp0PFNxmh0oT1RDcuMP0aIUMn+ll1isat2PLStslaN7
	IgbQP75OU21F1pgjKmTH/f6MhyZ3k6FMNkUeUbRn9TDj2mIKnaDr3Hon+NaNCMObxojREPmvXaUgfW0jn5LKwmcnt1BESLpO5xk=
X-Spam-Status:	No, score=-6.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS,
	KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4,
	RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE,
	TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version:	SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
	server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version:	2.1.29
List-Id:	General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive:	<https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Errors-To:	cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com
Sender:	"Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com>

On 2020-11-01 08:20, Stephen John Smoogen via Cygwin wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Nov 2020 at 04:02, Duncan Roe wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 01, 2020 at 08:49:23AM +0000, Fergus Daly wrote:
>>> With W7 no longer supported, W10-32 supported but no longer provided on
>>> new machines (Microsoft states that, "Beginning with Windows 10, version
>>> 2004, all new Windows 10 systems will be required to use 64-bit builds
>>> and Microsoft will no longer release 32-bit builds for OEM distribution
>>> .. the weaker version of Windows 10 has several limitations, like
>>> capping out at 3.2GB of RAM and less stringent security measures") and
>>> the functionality of Cygwin-32 significantly downplayed on Cygwin's own
>>> Home page, that really does leave Cygwin-64 on W10-64 on 64-bit hardware
>>> as the sole recommended platform. Yes?

Cygwin64 is the recommended release, there are no recommended platforms,
although there are minimum requirements for the code to run, and to build the
code: if you can run it under ReactOS on an old Pentium, good on you! ;^>

>> No, I run Cygwin64 on Win 7. There is an outstanding W7 update, it appeared
>> a few weeks ago, but I'm not taking it.
> The question is nuanced around "what is the recommended platform". Now as
> individuals we can recommend anything we want if it works for us.. but we
> also aren't expecting to answer all of Fergus's questions when he tries to
> get Cygwin working on his system. I think in the end, for the project, the
> recommendation would be whatever Corinna recommends as she is the primary
> author of the code these days and the one who would be fixing problems
> found.

That has been determined in the past by the need in a new Wdindows release,
version, or edition, to use a new API, that may not be avoided or skipped for
the oldest versions in a backward-compatible way, as happened when support for
new versions had to be added, so XP support had to be dropped.

-- 
Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

This email may be disturbing to some readers as it contains
too much technical detail. Reader discretion is advised.
[Data in binary units and prefixes, physical quantities in SI.]
--
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -