X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 5DC9738708CF
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com;
	s=default; t=1603108901;
	bh=s1RuE+zAZS15Kb98CeWC1hU77+Al6MfV9J8Z6mr2P8I=;
	h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:
	List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:
	Reply-To:From;
	b=LLw+BWYOdFbJMFuAXrMb9QuiMKA+5Rqc4LuLGJdwHZT8g9Bk0T18N0FE40thtYsMM
	O+ITZNDgkWXPCUUri/JlTIOhu1ad9kj+1gRIVYWzSrAen40Iryqa8FJo72tCr5z8nZ
	6fXdi2mwfbZ0wDhEWuCvYW43KxKjtMAoGtCoUNVo=
X-Original-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 8C8E13854824
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org;
	dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org;
	spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Mon, 19 Oct 2020 14:01:27 +0200
From:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: stat st_birthtim(espec)
Message-ID:	<20201019120127.GG5492@calimero.vinschen.de>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<202010190606 DOT 09J666Jp007285 AT ultimate DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<202010190606.09J666Jp007285@ultimate.com>
X-Provags-ID:	V03:K1:rxQiWqdM8CJ+mfb9ZBzuu6OykRYjdKtJiliu7V/USNB+VbYtRbl
	q3vCEtvrdolv6uppCLpUn76NL7/hoXNhJqXmmMUN2d1UkIalpnFag+ZKJApS6jMT7wAF1Na
	rSmEkobX1zKniE+LpGAFfhvms4JJvwG1a3syE+LVUpNHFrCe1mzJXRenyZoH1cH8Z5bX+Jc
	qHRL3ckl8BNln1UFU52Eg==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults:	notjunk:1;V03:K0:YmTwJN3SJcQ=:7YMTwYEX1WOpk/tWaH/GQd
	KaInOsPJr/pMiNQXutqvfZ/7rJQ3Amwrfos5fDW+/YEGyyTwOaYpSqueyNlFHs3Y8gMB6M0+p
	WolvoC6hHaww5+s1R8woEjGTgMNLivXnw7AMH/oZlfw5wkF93I3ZTwZAyqEZfXnSymaiODx9v
	WXP2M6vV6HGvwuSVF7mVL6GeUuG6QHNs03bqtCSEB2mowLhmOeZ66pP+LlBE/5/s+JqZ9wBWy
	cHyMqm0mk0z4myvmBFXM3Q8X1a6c7PMkhU5o7ooqCMhuMjQOHKdhJTZD9EVZspsHmbJf5MEc4
	6913GFJA71DIcl6zPXMDi2b+itkBWk3sAvsZy1FNBUEfsPDJkRABa5rW15TuAQgzbwpRQf/0p
	Fc3gQ51idd9FEe9N1ZeNlPxX5RPa7HFFPjBnFUE0zgmzs14+wvMG8Z5xBXTGDV1+5kB6MTypu
	tZifVN4qIg==
X-Spam-Status:	No, score=-100.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	GOOD_FROM_CORINNA_CYGWIN, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
	RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NEUTRAL,
	TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version:	SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
	server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version:	2.1.29
List-Id:	General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive:	<https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Errors-To:	cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com
Sender:	"Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com>

On Oct 19 02:06, Phil Budne wrote:
> While checking if an OSS project of mine (www.snobol4.org/csnobol4)
> compiled cleanly under Cygwin, I was happy to discover that struct
> stat contains file birth time as on various BSD based systems.
> 
> BUT, I was unhappy to find out that MacOS 10.15 and Cygwin 3.1.7 have
> non-overlapping definitions for birth time information.
> 
> FreeBSD 12, NetBSD 9, and OSX 10.15 all have a "timespec" available as
> "st_birthtimespec", but Cygwin does not.
> 
> On FreeBSD, NetBSD, and Cygwin the actual member of struct stat is
> st_birthtim, but on OSX, the member is st_birthtimespec, and there is
> no define for st_birthtim.
> 
> A st_birthtimespec define in cygwin/stat.h would make it easier to
> write portable code.

Well, portable code should use the st_atim/st_mtim/st_ctim members
directly and not use st_birthtim at all.

For the headers we're usually looking for Linux compatibility in the
first place and if that's any indication, we should add all the
st_XYZtimensec members, but *only* if __USE_XOPEN2K8 is defined
(equivalent _XOPEN_SOURCE >= 700 for Cygwin/newlib)

GLibc does not provide any st_XYZtimespec definitions, though.  I don't
think it really makes a lot of sense to add those with portability in
mind.


Corinna
--
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -