X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 64B783857C70
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org;
	dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=towo.net
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=towo AT towo DOT net
Subject:	Re: cygwin qsort erratic
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<CAHybJinLYpcviSFiJ=V-EZqoatEzjFfr9DOUzxzmofUmtwMS+w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<c9792fdc-aedc-6934-e11f-732f841b533b AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca>
	<CAHybJi=+uKitmwhWfuc564xz6qxZF+H=rA87LaB1NBJPkBAsUA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<1464bc69-4dd5-b63d-d1b9-048b52fe036e AT towo DOT net>
	<dd9d0748-4113-1b88-866c-abcb123e7f27 AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca>
	<CAHybJikqf2HdOMAfyN0fgNXcNMLWR=5UX_A5yv7cd-mXDgKwCQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
From:	Thomas Wolff <towo AT towo DOT net>
X-Tagtoolbar-Keys:	D20200902000048486
Message-ID:	<fbf2e661-4424-9dbb-5be1-dd5ff116ca5c@towo.net>
Date:	Wed, 2 Sep 2020 00:00:48 +0200
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
	Thunderbird/68.12.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<CAHybJikqf2HdOMAfyN0fgNXcNMLWR=5UX_A5yv7cd-mXDgKwCQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Provags-ID:	V03:K1:bfqE+mQXd4IlLOExZXGemay39qYXk0Gs/l/nDSkj4guFIs4MC0X
	U4bHzpAcb85ZOR5cmrv5IxQMVecMdYbY+b4FbxiQSTCI6mJ6e3A/JPuI2WMamhqUYwcSXfd
	hIXjb5BCHScBO1ZQURvg9RRQ7yXGhDs0y/aLkKeBjxvX8rcWdAJM+gbCIU0QEek2sE94zMA
	VnKKdyeXvFZz1iC52VVZA==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults:	notjunk:1;V03:K0:Qct2LI5PpZU=:aSturxi4BwNCObtCkohlK8
	PXV5h26SX1NTiKGUNlmMfyY7FO+4PfEVOeKr2zppfL/Jkvof3NTsmwCRWhFvlI/qkaJBY1dDN
	gwI1ovB2y3ydpCzoKySVDsjARDVyOvxCPHSbskFeQCI6VdGyfESI4Ipt0MRz0KNhXgwFgjihz
	Fo3Ku0EiHx53lppEUqhHEAln/ZvI56C+cFlGy1lrkhDs4RBD7dE2zKu/aVSlZotHfHiMgLkjH
	axqh3PBpXi3bKq9UoOwNB6xWd2CHvHH76PAMH2c9dYGPm6dIis4Bh4riMeVs/5xnATW+xRUG4
	PC+dP5h3xcZSL8NOi167KCfxqyMWVpLML51MIH3Q0b0NKHMhiJn4v4pfqjMcrshAyttBXi25z
	I4o2p4onarnFkXFPOguNQcStf65uaCbnj8J7ZvcGa4wwIp8/2W628y9KmCPnjDtR01wwjW5xV
	qMNP0fNViWM5/u7JPrMCSLOEP/r63Cu7oWLa1R+ECzhTNX3wn4ixVjTenWGZ/ztXqVD4cVzvP
	WS3gZFVytajG2WilPbRUjn6J7boLkzcyMEwGxaCvOfUqdc/yI4X4rTBoIxHjGKixlKIab/BVV
	6KEzv/K6s6vyAt4UjdA0hudOqVom+EGn+8z7FG3Ha8TEk+NCqVg/4XSNAJKyIGJ2adPjAfpzi
	7SJf/8p37js5c36TtrTwWt/IkzzZ5GtFkWvLzRcP7TWMF9q0oJ1w/VgRDmMWmMdn8GLLj+agM
	QSfuUuzo/iwTF6XG7RMNzWghKoZ43zW/hfbJexHNyGKNDKmpNq0BBT49PFO+vLOVsd5l11jpq
	ls9qnYRIYyiCNwXkmBmHtoHWdLBttbfSzWyzluKe9De/xdpr5fP6S0B62+MgRqdNTtSkjNO
X-Spam-Status:	No, score=-5.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, COVID_BODY,
	KAM_DMARC_STATUS, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
	RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE,
	TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version:	SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
	server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version:	2.1.29
List-Id:	General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive:	<https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To:	cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com
Sender:	"Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com>

Am 01.09.2020 um 22:29 schrieb Kurt-Karen Carlson-Lougheed via Cygwin:
>    Brian:
> 1. The Qsort() source I sent was from netbsd.org, NOT cygwin. netbsd works.
> 2. Complete package is on SourceForge as uac19 v3.3. I'm happy to send a
> tgz if you prefer that. Read 3 choices at end before considering this.
> 3. Data is curl'd from owid as shown in the script example. Likewise I can
> send a sample data set. The program analyzes COVID-19 csv files from either
> owid or github/nytimes
> 4. I've used qsort() for years. I agree, keeping the sort routines simple
> is always appropriate. I confirmed today the only ones that fail include
> float divides, lDsort() and lXsort() in attached c19sort.c. When it's
> pre-calculated and added to the struct it works, the code has a toggle now
> for testing that.
>
> Thomas:
> I tried (again) today  to build a simple test case. The data structures in
> use are complex, probably the only thing I can attempt is stripping down
> the code which will be very time consuming. I know you don't know me at
> all, but I've written code, debugged proprietary operating systems
> (assembler), performed OS dump analysis, troubleshot intermittent hardware
> issues, identified disk firmware issues causing intermittent data
> corruption, identified nfs performance issues, managed large hpc clusters,
> etc. etc. etc. over 40+ years.
Your code does not even compile. I did not ask for a minimal test case 
although that is generally appreciated. But a working test case at least 
is required to establlish your claim of a bug.
>
> I see three choices:
> A. One of you look at simple the qqsort wrapper. I modified my code to
> toggle between the functional netbsd Qsort() and cygwin qsort(). I have
> demonstrated erroneous results coming from the cygwin version in a small
> percentage of requests. If you can acknowledge that, perhaps you can check
> the cygwin version of qsort() vs. the current netbsd.org?
> B. If you could kindly provide me or point me to the cygwin qsort() source
> I'll check it out myself.
> C. We can thank each other and leave cygwin's qsort() as is broken in some
> small number of circumstances since I've compiled netbsd's into my code and
> that always works.
>
> Regards, kurt
--
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -