X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8DB0A3972C10
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com;
	s=default; t=1592941609;
	bh=aldNbnFuE51xYHvyK73C2/JeqJD5ulq62rrLx1kkooc=;
	h=To:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:
	List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:
	From;
	b=Tx5R2mgiVqCxJ8F1hxdtdtue3y3Q5f3y2lvBQX3t8zq0O6bNqrBJTQw7uyaHH32gz
	/spLLQON8BLf9tcUn2D5o5k6SETzb0wL4O7lUb6FG1gY2aQ22OHcss91qvx0kHeMhr
	Pkq93lMJcZ5NTaUDEUITWOWEPRvI+uwetaBOk3Ro=
X-Original-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org B5630394841C
ARC-Seal:	i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none;
	b=fG9r5+ujOpPUToYU+ZdbC+B84a7o2FAPgqQYfAY6++eJLIFiNy+iebRim1RdkUKcBxUKUvP4hoTrVucy2YXTuJSfA591kF0JQPHbS6KlOnC6aqU+2irHxsif300ldhupLjyTsqD+OF+TJOi9UQu6fgAAo4dRyxYdFtwX6N7Jon2z/nJ1NoAaW1JZzpesKTNobhAnShSI+abwZBbixGtGSbSFR5/Gf7zNcqTB6o+KV9buBdbfPzRgeARs5kg94SKf6WdToSg04CDYNosi1BGj9sJA9844gHDaN2P04Zucv1sm/r9eGWHsioaNccWuL/N9ZnTI8dxtcKztSOsHzvD7Vw==
ARC-Message-Signature:	i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com;
	s=arcselector9901;
	h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck;
	bh=oSdSyxWXY+m8FIZMxFsNjq/iVn7MxPmGy62op89oTtQ=;
	b=kUkp9FaUZvpwWh+LP9t96PQAUfXZvrB0TZg0f3rultMxaRusOT/GMIpk8wEF7aKGk7RBbAjHZkRxpB6E+MEJA75HLeDpsD9hpeXp667nefFPgyrbwFGbbQCHBDy1eyx3JOU7HgrRcrTKWbh/a+58+xZX2FAsQGaCVNZ8TpEVx1Ge8lniMDhxG+G415TuyUXQWm04wFWbVp4sIg7gQ72nFwBX9LEq9lyBE+oPqWWdHgG8VJ1Nwb0CkGQx1X4tkLqKzWMCatuVyVdBgt+Q7WZLVxgI1N2+sIduyHlqlpweqtwjZJYZhEwZ43guZyxddhAZEvtfp22/8SlDVnlxAbcrkQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results:	i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=none; dmarc=none;
	dkim=none; arc=none
To:	cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: [cygwin] DD bug fails to wipe last 48 sectors of a disk
Thread-Topic:	[cygwin] DD bug fails to wipe last 48 sectors of a disk
Thread-Index:	AQHWRlgtCZZ0g6noFEKBC6QD7s7xqKjgYswAgAAb2ayAAXbVgIAEYnXDgAAL3YCAADzJEA==
Date:	Tue, 23 Jun 2020 19:46:44 +0000
Message-ID:	<DB7PR01MB519371C6CAE2D3CFFEF41DCAD5940@DB7PR01MB5193.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com>
References:	<DB7PR01MB5193A18F1D947ED4C276CD25D5980 AT DB7PR01MB5193 DOT eurprd01 DOT prod DOT exchangelabs DOT com>
	<1d1801d64677$bea56050$3bf020f0$@pdinc.us>
	<DB7PR01MB5193CC1C7630FB13B81B9DBAD5980 AT DB7PR01MB5193 DOT eurprd01 DOT prod DOT exchangelabs DOT com>
	<60bf1507-4edb-a03f-ec14-07e1ab7f0d94 AT cs DOT umass DOT edu>
	<DB7PR01MB519396195ADB3E3E1217B22BD5940 AT DB7PR01MB5193 DOT eurprd01 DOT prod DOT exchangelabs DOT com>,
	<CAKNeuBqZpacuUwTD6U+kKPGOO052VYhpRnttm=HYr7m+OT7tiA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<CAKNeuBqZpacuUwTD6U+kKPGOO052VYhpRnttm=HYr7m+OT7tiA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language:	en-GB, en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-incomingtopheadermarker:	OriginalChecksum:DE9AEB2F8B4042121A9CC725F852FD4BCB9343FCA006045E36DBA8F2A32C536E;
	UpperCasedChecksum:D989805699F27D6A6918717569365D59FF970A746E6DE8DA7CB31FF4830E460D;
	SizeAsReceived:7301; Count:44
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype:	1
x-tmn:	[yM78XtCs7fC1a6Uup9tBrj+Ds+bQCK6r]
x-ms-publictraffictype:	Email
x-incomingheadercount:	44
x-eopattributedmessage:	0
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id:	d89cd335-9115-47ce-79fe-08d817ae287e
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic:	AM5EUR03HT088:
x-microsoft-antispam:	BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info:	cCYno46E9ZxyccCciP+6VE2GLKYnswVnFHWgQILqTTrMDuF/Y5mtJEO5jo8NEogCoxpIepZTuQ/H3MIpQG0Twmd2ShnWwOfv4LyhlOHx1ezeebuPfVSKx35ZKFXz8HGJS+iBEYliKzMPzC7nOtm52R01c4sM8q7Ipz18weTZOpcnEAql51vqZUciS82prEWJTi1qSGpEJZWBJIonRr4fDbE44dcMIM+/7SCo4D9EaCCsaKtU8I7BizOHE7dZGZUz
x-forefront-antispam-report:	CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:0; SRV:;
	IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:DB7PR01MB5193.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com; PTR:;
	CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:; DIR:OUT; SFP:1901;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata:	YHPaToYnu/uUyYKWMXfoRc07QYIOOpPMAEqUzh30wCf0GMpJrn6TPp4EwcndsbHztoxn9bkpNTqd+Ll800awf5fC8jQfLRVeYOvWPyHlf/v3oKjkfqbQ2qtQiipU4NTb9zrGTuVwpufZngzA2JdWoQ==
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked:	True
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-OriginatorOrg:	hotmail.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg:	00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id:	d89cd335-9115-47ce-79fe-08d817ae287e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-rms-persistedconsumerorg:	00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime:	23 Jun 2020 19:46:44.2861 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader:	Internet
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id:	84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped:	AM5EUR03HT088
X-Spam-Status:	No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS,
	TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version:	SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
	server2.sourceware.org
X-Content-Filtered-By:	Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29
X-BeenThere:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version:	2.1.29
List-Id:	General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Archive:	<https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:	<http://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
From:	Hashim Aziz via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To:	Hashim Aziz <hashaziz AT hotmail DOT com>
Sender:	"Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com>

I've just tested with the command:

dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda iflag=fullblock bs=4M status=progress

...and can confirm that the last 48 sectors remain unwiped in this case also.

Here is the output:

1000182120448 bytes (1.0 TB, 931 GiB) copied, 8284 s, 121 MB/s
dd: error writing '/dev/sda': No space left on device
238468+0 records in
238467+0 records out
1000204861440 bytes (1.0 TB, 932 GiB) copied, 8284.89 s, 121 MB/s

________________________________
From: Cygwin <cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com> on behalf of Nicholas Clark via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Sent: 23 June 2020 5:06 PM
To: cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: Re: [cygwin] DD bug fails to wipe last 48 sectors of a disk

Do you get the same behavior when you run dd with iflag=fullblock? Without
that flag, it's possible dd's input to read a smaller block than requested
(which would correspond with a smaller write to the output).

On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 9:28 AM Hashim Aziz via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
wrote:

> I hadn't checked with 512 byte block sizes because of the amount of time
> it would have taken, but sure enough have just finished trying with bs=512
> and no block size at all (so dd's default block size, which is either 512
> or 1024) and although each wipe took over 24 hours, they did indeed wipe
> all of the sectors. So it seems that there's a bug with regards to how
> Cygwin handles the last block when a large (i.e. sane) block size is
> selected, and that this bug doesn't occur on actual UNIX-based systems.
>
> ________________________________
> From: Cygwin <cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com> on behalf of Eliot Moss <
> moss AT cs DOT umass DOT edu>
> Sent: 20 June 2020 9:26 PM
> To: The Cygwin Mailing List <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
> Subject: Re: [cygwin] DD bug fails to wipe last 48 sectors of a disk
>
> On 6/20/2020 1:31 PM, Hashim Aziz via Cygwin wrote:
> > To reproduce simply run the following command on a drive (obviously,
> this will irreversibly wipe all data):
> >
> > dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdX bs=4M status=progress
> >
> > Both drives were attached via internal SATA (by way of a PCIE to SATA
> Host Bus Adapter).
> >
> > Cygwin was running in an elevated window as dd cannot run in Cygwin
> without administrator access, at least not on Windows 10 and not when
> dealing with raw disks. I was running Avast the first time I discovered
> this, and am currently running Windows Defender, so doubt that the AV is
> the cause of this.
> >
> > The hard drives are a Western Digital WD10PURX-64E5EY0 (Serial:
> WD-WCC4J6HX189U) and a Kingston SV200S3128G (Serial: 12BA315PKAWK).
> >
> > I just ran DD for Windows 0.6beta3 with variations of the following
> command:
> >
> > dd.exe if=/dev/zero of=\\.\PHYSICALDRIVEX --progress bs=4M
> >
> > ...and can confirm that the bug also manifests here, but in a slightly
> different way - irrespective of the disk or block size, it fails to wipe
> the last 176 sectors of the drive.
>
> I was going to ask: even with block size 512 bytes?  But I guess you
> checked that ...
>
> Regards - Eliot
> --
> Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
> FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
> Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
> Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> --
> Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
> FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
> Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
> Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
>
--
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
--
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -