X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 2244F3951C78
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org;
	dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=cs.umass.edu
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org;
	spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=moss AT cs DOT umass DOT edu
Subject:	Re: [cygwin] DD bug fails to wipe last 48 sectors of a disk
To:	Hashim Aziz <hashaziz AT hotmail DOT com>, cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<DB7PR01MB5193A18F1D947ED4C276CD25D5980 AT DB7PR01MB5193 DOT eurprd01 DOT prod DOT exchangelabs DOT com>
	<1d1801d64677$bea56050$3bf020f0$@pdinc.us>
	<DB7PR01MB5193CC1C7630FB13B81B9DBAD5980 AT DB7PR01MB5193 DOT eurprd01 DOT prod DOT exchangelabs DOT com>
	<60bf1507-4edb-a03f-ec14-07e1ab7f0d94 AT cs DOT umass DOT edu>
	<DB7PR01MB519396195ADB3E3E1217B22BD5940 AT DB7PR01MB5193 DOT eurprd01 DOT prod DOT exchangelabs DOT com>
From:	Eliot Moss <moss AT cs DOT umass DOT edu>
Message-ID:	<239d7547-efe8-4b59-6f4f-8a387baf8048@cs.umass.edu>
Date:	Tue, 23 Jun 2020 11:29:45 -0400
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
	Thunderbird/68.9.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<DB7PR01MB519396195ADB3E3E1217B22BD5940@DB7PR01MB5193.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com>
X-Spam-Status:	No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS,
	SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version:	SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
	server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version:	2.1.29
List-Id:	General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<http://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive:	<https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:	<http://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To:	moss AT cs DOT umass DOT edu
Errors-To:	cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com
Sender:	"Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com>

On 6/23/2020 11:28 AM, Hashim Aziz via Cygwin wrote:
> I hadn't checked with 512 byte block sizes because of the amount of time it would have taken, but sure enough have just finished trying with bs=512 and no block size at all (so dd's default block size, which is either 512 or 1024) and although each wipe took over 24 hours, they did indeed wipe all of the sectors. So it seems that there's a bug with regards to how Cygwin handles the last block when a large (i.e. sane) block size is selected, and that this bug doesn't occur on actual UNIX-based systems.

Well, that certainly points the finger at last-block handling ... EM
--
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -