X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8E88C388F05C
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com;
	s=default; t=1591815512;
	bh=v6+Jp1IPhYqgUODACgv6mVln1Yso+XsySS7mbPAI5T4=;
	h=Subject:To:References:Date:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:
	List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:
	From;
	b=G2OhLJRw9/oEroxXL1UxNIDH9kyq45kkbFNrc2WQRcjv+LvqXOA99g92Pp5C5AIfp
	U2ymSkzv4Hg8WQYc7LXc6oiiB3htDzY4CcZtnwj+PBbofteUoHsOvHf9CLD9L+0mf3
	GVNGUbUX7zrmi86XVo7qWBIJj+QUT/qVzutHfahQ=
X-Original-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 3CE9A3851C3C
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
	h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language
	:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=u22DWwLlWBVX/I7wHsjdljRPFabltrISro3QCUMVOJw=;
	b=ebPT75FId/8CoDReJIflr5pKeeFR4wjIU8gZ/1fevI3SRMoX72R3tOU13oAQrE3Epa
	7fUMLsZLm5Kw+/OuvV+Vk7qyyPJnAeMWFuMsIgkq3v2JtzjH/+78ullkB8HYliNYX8WN
	cSFOkAEfyF7v5RB6OwXjcwnxlSRexItm0gKqQbGbEilFhh9QVlEf49JSlXMGwzKsmiBN
	JkNdqu8WHMT8TVIYBShgpHvaBvi0Gp9Vp4ClgrBQiV4RQNqhKGb9ixCMz8sJ7tftta+1
	F4bN8fO9SugsNMF4JDlVeWa6gAcjz8/QKR5Cti2tWTA0OrTi1eotKcsaZPu12XuDyTQq
	G1mg==
X-Gm-Message-State:	AOAM532WnfFADBXff+bEI0tD17i1QdObBhewPNBo4sg/r4candgVR3R/
	Y6XUDd/P4uEdRSNSRSfNu9v3b69xGQo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source:	ABdhPJxoi6aTsVi0BMLJY2xrXwxOfU56vHZe7PsXRqCsFPbS9PjEHPV9CqCrVyfAq8albeOiFtRNxA==
X-Received:	by 2002:a1c:4b0f:: with SMTP id y15mr4756555wma.83.1591815507477;
	Wed, 10 Jun 2020 11:58:27 -0700 (PDT)
Subject:	Re: coreutils refresh request (again)
To:	"cygwin AT cygwin DOT com" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<DM6PR09MB40432C69723E46A203AF2915A5830 AT DM6PR09MB4043 DOT namprd09 DOT prod DOT outlook DOT com>
Message-ID:	<f55c53bb-64a3-c3a7-54d0-12f439b99525@gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 10 Jun 2020 20:58:26 +0200
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
	Thunderbird/68.9.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<DM6PR09MB40432C69723E46A203AF2915A5830@DM6PR09MB4043.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
X-Spam-Status:	No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,
	TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version:	SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
	server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version:	2.1.29
List-Id:	General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<http://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive:	<https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:	<http://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
From:	Marco Atzeri via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To:	Marco Atzeri <marco DOT atzeri AT gmail DOT com>
Errors-To:	cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com
Sender:	"Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com>

On 10.06.2020 20:24, Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] via Cygwin wrote:
>> but it is missing the patch used to adapt it to Cygwin.
>> The patch modifies 27 files and unfortunately does not applies
>> clean to latest upstream source.
> 
> Fair enough (and again, there was no pushing);  but are you sure that all 27 patches are still actual?
> 
> Testsuite ran pretty well, though.  I looked as some failures (not all), and they looked rather benign.
> 
> ============================================================================
> Testsuite summary for GNU coreutils 8.32
> ============================================================================
> # TOTAL: 621
> # PASS:  413
> # SKIP:  167
> # XFAIL: 0
> # FAIL:  33
> # XPASS: 0
> # ERROR: 8
> 
>> The are at lest 3 points that need rewriting
> 
> Okay;  maybe those should be reported upstream, as Cygwin is largely standard-compliant these days?
> 

the testsuite is not relevant for these changes.

Coreutils are tweaked to manage "program" and "program.exe" as they
are the same thing and other similar things.
Some changes were propagated upstream and some not; I looked at the
first patch rejected, and upstream have reversed the logic of a test
that the patch was modifying to add one of these cases, so modifying the
source is not banal and need some consideration and test.

Both requires time that someone need to put for it.

Regards
Marco







--
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -