X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 398D83870854
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com;
	s=default; t=1588898016;
	bh=M3ZPKxziZSwQ157yGYNHRUeL/8AD2A1BR8uvlQCI6R8=;
	h=Subject:From:To:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:
	List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:
	From;
	b=OB3kpPZWkRFHife0CyQLC/cC3NKJKNbztJtfv2gcZvvfHax47GCIUUXDkSCn3z6dh
	YkO0XX8ft4IjG0OcESwZ8Rua504n4J7Crl2pDbsV1Wu62dC6ZjMfIpX9qUi8t7tvL9
	yqz5O+eHqq5b5E4gZD1hvAi+d+cuXGrtG+g2d+kw=
X-Original-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 1753C385DC1B
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org;
	dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org;
	spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=yselkowitz AT cygwin DOT com
X-MC-Unique:	k5OAV65NPTKvTo1XcUfg9w-1
Message-ID:	<95f068fab863e88dfe99734834e00af73a13d64a.camel@cygwin.com>
Subject:	Re: Default mingw _WIN32_WINNT
From:	Yaakov Selkowitz <yselkowitz AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Thu, 07 May 2020 20:33:28 -0400
In-Reply-To:	<20200505085436.GC3947@calimero.vinschen.de>
References:	<7101b829ec197e48e3aaf373625d950e95e29df4 DOT camel AT cygwin DOT com>
	<CALK-3m+s1ZaBq1L2yHj1aVZbps98X+sQrHJATmfJEQ4oLenBOA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20200505085436 DOT GC3947 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
User-Agent:	Evolution 3.34.4 (3.34.4-1.fc31)
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Scanned-By:	MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score:	0
X-Mimecast-Originator:	cygwin.com
X-Spam-Status:	No, score=-7.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE,
	SPF_NEUTRAL, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version:	SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
	server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version:	2.1.29
List-Id:	General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<http://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive:	<https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:	<http://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To:	cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com
Sender:	"Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com>

On Tue, 2020-05-05 at 10:54 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On May  5 08:45, Biswapriyo Nath via Cygwin wrote:
> > Chaging the defines in package may break others installation.
> 
> No, it doesn't in this case.

In what case would it?

> Yaakov is talking about mingw-w64 headers used to create *Cygwin*
> applications using the occasional Windows function.  Cygwin executables
> in the distro run on Vista but not on XP or 2K3 anymore, given the
> Cygwin DLL doesn't.

That too, as well as the mingw64-*-headers used in the MinGW-w64
toolchain.

> Therefore it might be a good idea to bump the default for these
> Cygwin-related headers to at least 0x0600.
> 
> Setting them to 0x0602 sounds like a good idea, but as long as we didn't
> drop Vista or W7 support it might be premature.

I suppose so for Cygwin, but the mingw64-*-headers could be different.

> Btw., checking Cygwin sources for Vista and W7-specific code, it turned
> out that actually very few lines of code handle Vista or W7-specific
> workarounds.  The advantage of removing the code is pretty minor, so I
> didn't push the changes.  While it's a bad idea to keep Vista and W7
> running (at least attached to the internet), we can support them a while
> longer.

Fair enough.

--
Yaakov

--
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -