X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org E0CB0386F028
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none)
	header.from=SystematicSw.ab.ca
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org;
	spf=none smtp.mailfrom=brian DOT inglis AT systematicsw DOT ab DOT ca
X-Authority-Analysis:	v=2.3 cv=LKf9vKe9 c=1 sm=1 tr=0
	a=kiZT5GMN3KAWqtYcXc+/4Q==:117 a=kiZT5GMN3KAWqtYcXc+/4Q==:17
	a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=N54-gffFAAAA:8 a=uZvujYp8AAAA:8 a=fjDFcf429ns8VtWUCqQA:9
	a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=vUnNYP7aSF4A:10 a=6l0D2HzqY3Epnrm8mE3f:22
	a=SLzB8X_8jTLwj6mN0q5r:22
Subject:	Re: building net-snmp: (was: Updated: net-snmp-5.8-1)
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<CAD8GWstxAAQ_A0WzkLC71=CV_A_2xoG4YcQVY-25uV5stm+Zww AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
From:	Brian Inglis <Brian DOT Inglis AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca>
Autocrypt:	addr=Brian DOT Inglis AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca; prefer-encrypt=mutual;
	keydata=
	mDMEXopx8xYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAnCK0qv/xwUCCZQoA9BHRYpstERrspfT0NkUWQVuoePa0
	LkJyaWFuIEluZ2xpcyA8QnJpYW4uSW5nbGlzQFN5c3RlbWF0aWNTdy5hYi5jYT6IlgQTFggA
	PhYhBMM5/lbU970GBS2bZB62lxu92I8YBQJeinHzAhsDBQkJZgGABQsJCAcCBhUKCQgLAgQW
	AgMBAh4BAheAAAoJEB62lxu92I8Y0ioBAI8xrggNxziAVmr+Xm6nnyjoujMqWcq3oEhlYGAO
	WacZAQDFtdDx2koSVSoOmfaOyRTbIWSf9/Cjai29060fsmdsDLg4BF6KcfMSCisGAQQBl1UB
	BQEBB0Awv8kHI2PaEgViDqzbnoe8B9KMHoBZLS92HdC7ZPh8HQMBCAeIfgQYFggAJhYhBMM5
	/lbU970GBS2bZB62lxu92I8YBQJeinHzAhsMBQkJZgGAAAoJEB62lxu92I8YZwUBAJw/74rF
	IyaSsGI7ewCdCy88Lce/kdwX7zGwid+f8NZ3AQC/ezTFFi5obXnyMxZJN464nPXiggtT9gN5
	RSyTY8X+AQ==
Organization:	Systematic Software
Message-ID:	<176f156b-b42b-6573-0f19-840caa5445b4@SystematicSw.ab.ca>
Date:	Tue, 28 Apr 2020 09:58:51 -0600
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
	Thunderbird/68.7.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<CAD8GWstxAAQ_A0WzkLC71=CV_A_2xoG4YcQVY-25uV5stm+Zww@mail.gmail.com>
X-CMAE-Envelope:	MS4wfOR68RRp1r2BAPBlLiOCsitDzJfxIy41OjXILoycyvQOHIvL/7TLOvRRUojW3KPr8wd3NmLuFmzdcX1Jk6eDuBBQaAbszI6BwcDXc7RtNjHV5/EjSCVB
	8dv+7W8D3/4sbMyXjF36APFpOFCMIKdRNT71094zXCc0/aB9vepm7PQvlIqNe012z9hbowY/0Li7Kg==
X-Spam-Status:	No, score=-16.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS,
	KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE,
	TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version:	SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
	server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version:	2.1.29
List-Id:	General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<http://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive:	<https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:	<http://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Errors-To:	cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com
Sender:	"Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com>

On 2020-04-28 09:38, Lee via Cygwin wrote:
>> If you want to make a point or ask a question the Cygwin mailing list is
>> the appropriate place.
> 
> You don't need this anymore
>   02-path-separator.patch
> if you build net-snmp with
>   export ENV_SEPARATOR=":"
> 
> And maybe now they'll accept a patch so that building on cygwin
> doesn't require an evar.  I think  "gcc -mno-cygwin ..."  might still
> have been supported when I tried to get it changed and the best they'd
> do was an evar when building.
> 
> Is 06-winstub.patch necessary?  Necessary if all you're using is the
> command line tools?
> The changelog has this
> commit fda421625d20d8f8201479fa7f33c257fdc72015
> Author: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche AT acm DOT org>
> Date:   Sun Nov 27 11:25:40 2016 -0800
> 
>     Cygwin: getnetent() / getnetbyaddr() build fix
> 
>     Recent versions of Cygwin have prototypes but no implementation for
>     these functions. Hence avoid that the Cygwin prototypes conflict
>     with the implementation.
> 
> In other words, if I'm using just the snmp{get,set} command line
> tools, should I be applying this patch?

The current /usr/include/netdb.h definitions from cygwin-devel match the
prototypes under endnetent(3p) and netdb.h(0p) from man-pages-posix.
If you don't have cygwin-devel installed it shouldn't be an issue, and the
supplied implementation of the missing interfaces should match the POSIX specs:

	https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/basedefs/netdb.h.html

-- 
Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

This email may be disturbing to some readers as it contains
too much technical detail. Reader discretion is advised.
--
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -