X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E6870387084A
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com;
	s=default; t=1587482069;
	bh=Wo/NBDT9yNz30A3thGNFmF1MavAP8geZj0wtV2f0HWo=;
	h=References:In-Reply-To:Date:Subject:To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:
	List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:
	From;
	b=B4Vce6gnAst/Kja53HYvj5Qethn0cUxHzcYWQ6UBzWaWlCfUfPTOdVoL0jYppIRWo
	UOa/BOWvezbFFf85aZ/KR1wBWLeFz68e0IiWdaLRX0FpP6YLkdne4gPgVgAU0FwRwp
	y3YCgFghJfYVwwpCb5gR6kWehK65VLAxhLI4Biu4=
X-Original-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 7E069386F02B
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
	:message-id:subject:to;
	bh=wlUpLOrlvxN6dOLdlOBTKTzT1261VeGllTBt/mIRAt4=;
	b=A5fKbUmUQ0Q0QlpeZmADVqAvrfomPn+0qI74kBUJKPtU4h32mtQJLoenFM8x/CvTps
	s9XJ9W60D4b60emq/Ho9msBHiOq+jqHFQbdgxaTxlZv/EWS0PHm/H++5LCYdpiWvSU8x
	BQs+ZyqVaA6y+p1ZGzR2Pt8LCPdxE1r3jpgP8wh40MT7Nqf5Gs2hj6As8bP6e6gyHcdV
	G2NqNXZoWpo2PpRShKfStadNA7BfaN8/A3iP4Qwjq6BGLBUGaoJeZZC6k71Qe8bAEYHn
	nxbGOmYZpKUgemSpH6whtB/MBCKQJx/10Er2zM5XtHo7fY3/GYowwSXRZULsCC5Vo4qt
	7T/g==
X-Gm-Message-State:	AGi0Pua17Nsd9JZ2+CVxF4QsC7MTvEuUQlcXt3s3dfh/EWbaQe5AFfrc
	m3AoV02NH5BpZNWGiWfJhERHmrmBHmU1j7MtY8+PvBw9
X-Google-Smtp-Source:	APiQypJBXB/S3gujS9er4zkj6ME92vb7nkKJcV1RiMxRpTNcZtX0ZMUkqR2zCBBQdrUSCA6OAVeu9ViZLF2VqT0mxWk=
X-Received:	by 2002:a2e:a549:: with SMTP id e9mr13633366ljn.28.1587482063870;
	Tue, 21 Apr 2020 08:14:23 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version:	1.0
References:	<CAKepmaicf+zJDzgdTBQCHbjNqGXbm2yLWkrsxe6XYTucBk3FPg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<CAKepmaicf+zJDzgdTBQCHbjNqGXbm2yLWkrsxe6XYTucBk3FPg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 21 Apr 2020 11:14:10 -0400
Message-ID:	<CAKepmajsRwzkmqzjJsZqkk_eJSkSarTiJ8QGuxFzDAeWNG+3bw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: nc fails to connect the first time and then succeeds
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Spam-Status:	No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
	SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version:	SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
	server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version:	2.1.29
List-Id:	General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Archive:	<https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:	<http://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
From:	Jack Adrian Zappa via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To:	Jack Adrian Zappa <adrianh DOT bsc AT gmail DOT com>
Sender:	"Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com>

Nm.  I figured it out.  Seems if you don't specify what type of
listener, it'll default to IP4.  When you create a sender, it'll try
first using IP6 and then fall back to IP4.  It's that first connection
that is causing the failure.  If you specify the listener to use IP6,
then it works fine.

Thanks,

A

On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 3:48 AM Jack Adrian Zappa <adrianh DOT bsc AT gmail DOT com> wrote:
>
> I was trying to do some testing of a ssh port forwarding issue I was
> having, by trying to reduce the problem into something simpler.  So I
> reached for netcat (nc).  Turns out that when trying to connect a
> listener to a sender directly, it will fail first and then succeed.
>
> Example:
> In terminal 1 we do:
>
> $ nc -l 1234
>
> nc waits.  In terminal 2 we do:
>
> $ nc -v localhost 1234
> nc: connect to localhost port 1234 (tcp) failed: Connection refused
> Connection to localhost 1234 port [tcp/*] succeeded!
>
> The initial failure is fine when connecting directly, but this failure
> is disastrous when connecting through an ssh connection.  This is
> because when the sshd connects to the nc listener, it will first fail
> and then succeed.  However, that first failure makes the sshd think
> that there is no connection to be had and just closes the tunnel,
> making the nc sender just terminate.
>
> Is this a coding error or somehow by design?  If by design, then why?
> If by error, then when can we expect this to be fixed?
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Adrian
--
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -