X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B621D388A02B
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com;
	s=default; t=1586221044;
	bh=HDRbwnbtGIehQMerEUFimMgg61huVIVXa3hG2TtFXWQ=;
	h=Subject:From:To:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:
	List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:
	From;
	b=EP2psgO4Ha2IFahkLvhWUT2dNrb23VDaaDPxpUEIy/ANYtnkgPNOU5xaRfDqECSRq
	JSepU+XK85iQUguO9HK2uwL6vFuR+TZYXVgG08BK0grXO/sor19qKnyNsC29YsHjUI
	f3fxU5ecS05Eggmr05xHXnllk+vLGfLN5CMwZIjg=
X-Original-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org ABECE385BF83
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org;
	dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org;
	spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=yselkowitz AT cygwin DOT com
X-MC-Unique:	8LUlzJ91MjKXLbYF6UYP7A-1
Message-ID:	<1589e4d3f86e0fb8102ffa419af0d0ccf53d6cca.camel@cygwin.com>
Subject:	Re: Problem in mingw64-i686-binutils [Was: Updated:
	binutils-2.34+1git.de9c1b7cfe-1 (x86/x86_64)]
From:	Yaakov Selkowitz <yselkowitz AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Mon, 06 Apr 2020 20:57:07 -0400
In-Reply-To:	<d77a6a7d-7ce1-1349-cc35-96f9f0213ef1@gmail.com>
References:	<CAAXzdLWXD09FkgTmo2FY0kH4NmyYeAu9gnQaarkwYxKjYjOx3Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAO1jNwvJsgL92nOdyTMfdL8_Rj211o=T3Aro=6PouDoM_T+X7g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAO1jNwtsZ_2JzydqvavfbNzn_xh-noU8EXSNG_xdrH_7fdt5=Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<d77a6a7d-7ce1-1349-cc35-96f9f0213ef1 AT gmail DOT com>
User-Agent:	Evolution 3.34.4 (3.34.4-1.fc31)
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Scanned-By:	MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score:	0
X-Mimecast-Originator:	cygwin.com
X-Spam-Status:	No, score=-8.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL,
	KAM_DMARC_STATUS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NEUTRAL,
	TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version:	SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
	server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version:	2.1.29
List-Id:	General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<http://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive:	<https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:	<http://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To:	cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com
Sender:	"Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com>

On Mon, 2020-04-06 at 23:55 +0000, JonY via Cygwin wrote:
> On 4/6/20 10:07 AM, Jan Nijtmans via Cygwin wrote:
> > Ping.
> > 
> > Would it be possible to release a version of mingw64-i686-binutils with the
> > same patch as done for binutils-2.34+1git.de9c1b7cfe-1? I suspect
> > this would resolve the problem described here.
> 
> Can you please report this issue to the binutils mailing list? I am
> unfamiliar with the binutils internals to know what exactly went wrong.

JonY,

I think the relevant differences after 2.34 were PR24511 and PR25447,
which are already fixed upstream:

https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=40bfb9762747f8336b17c70a0173d10200fa62eb
https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=82f439d028c65663a0baf0a17ef5c4a2ea5c84a7

Adding those as patches to 2.34 should fix the issue without having to
resort to a git snapshot.

--
Yaakov


--
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -