delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-Original-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
DMARC-Filter: | OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 25BB9385F02A |
Authentication-Results: | sourceware.org; |
dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=cs.umass.edu | |
Authentication-Results: | sourceware.org; |
spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=moss AT cs DOT umass DOT edu | |
Subject: | Re: Why is taskset still not in util-linux? |
To: | cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
References: | <1348011a-261a-2a87-d361-4e51fa8dc19f AT cs DOT umass DOT edu> |
<85ae12aa-6cc3-5d4c-5df2-25bf811ec6a9 AT maxrnd DOT com> | |
<72fea68a-b3d7-e87c-726f-8a5a2587a992 AT maxrnd DOT com> | |
<01e3d337-e5fe-f393-7634-3f1881bca315 AT cs DOT umass DOT edu> | |
<dca24f26-9da9-591c-19c1-8020e5de3a4e AT maxrnd DOT com> | |
<79d7afa5-a07b-04df-c259-b76c61390f8c AT maxrnd DOT com> | |
<c075b981d41ff880e0af76c853e764c468b9c6de DOT camel AT cygwin DOT com> | |
From: | Eliot Moss <moss AT cs DOT umass DOT edu> |
Message-ID: | <dd8104f5-4a76-1ff3-f769-69154991aa80@cs.umass.edu> |
Date: | Fri, 20 Mar 2020 21:46:27 -0400 |
User-Agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 |
Thunderbird/68.6.0 | |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <c075b981d41ff880e0af76c853e764c468b9c6de.camel@cygwin.com> |
X-Spam-Status: | No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL, |
KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_NONE, | |
SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 | |
X-Spam-Checker-Version: | SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on |
server2.sourceware.org | |
X-BeenThere: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
X-Mailman-Version: | 2.1.29 |
List-Id: | Cygwin mailing list <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Unsubscribe: | <http://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>, |
<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe> | |
List-Archive: | <http://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help> |
List-Subscribe: | <http://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>, |
<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe> | |
Reply-To: | moss AT cs DOT umass DOT edu |
Errors-To: | cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com |
Sender: | "Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com> |
On 3/20/2020 9:39 AM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > Cygwin doesn't support syscalls. I'd be very wary of any code which is > conditional on any #ifdef SYS_*. Of course. AFAICT taskset does not need the syscall, it just needs the library call to work. Asking about the syscall is, I suppose, a kind of Linux shorthand to see if something is supported on the particular platform. Mark's suggestion of providing a fake definition of that syscall definition is a workaround that may disturb the util-linux sources the least. Regards - Eliot -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |