X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org D4D47385F02A
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org;
	dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=yandex.ru
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org;
	spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=anrdaemon AT yandex DOT ru
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail;
	t=1584741001; bh=OPHz3/GdJN8PquVe57So36Gpmizq78hsMTtH6h01Z6c=;
	h=In-Reply-To:Subject:To:Reply-To:From:Message-ID:References:Date;
	b=asItTY0E9jgt83lqJGzbAYsw2AO05sJaEYyQGBV7Hs8cyiAO3g9xZH+Rg/sJzLlPd
	CWNx6RmEYSCqFnAdyxHCjMqYObo9Fi2+935gaaYGajyRDE0wqYZb/PZigLCbt/u4lv
	JsLzwEsvPSCgOSaVcjwl0r3x6d0XqrgMQa4H6QS4=
Authentication-Results:	mxback3o.mail.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.ru
Date:	Sat, 21 Mar 2020 00:42:58 +0300
From:	Andrey Repin <anrdaemon AT yandex DOT ru>
X-Mailer:	The Bat! (v6.8.8) Home
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
Message-ID:	<1682648314.20200321004258@yandex.ru>
To:	Eliot Moss <moss AT cs DOT umass DOT edu>, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Why is taskset still not in util-linux?
In-Reply-To:	<205bb6db-81d0-3530-2c5c-8ea76351e9a0@cs.umass.edu>
References:	<1348011a-261a-2a87-d361-4e51fa8dc19f AT cs DOT umass DOT edu>
	<85ae12aa-6cc3-5d4c-5df2-25bf811ec6a9 AT maxrnd DOT com>
	<72fea68a-b3d7-e87c-726f-8a5a2587a992 AT maxrnd DOT com>
	<01e3d337-e5fe-f393-7634-3f1881bca315 AT cs DOT umass DOT edu>
	<dca24f26-9da9-591c-19c1-8020e5de3a4e AT maxrnd DOT com>
	<79d7afa5-a07b-04df-c259-b76c61390f8c AT maxrnd DOT com>
	<205bb6db-81d0-3530-2c5c-8ea76351e9a0 AT cs DOT umass DOT edu>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Spam-Status:	No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, KAM_THEBAT,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE,
	SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version:	SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
	server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version:	2.1.29
List-Id:	Cygwin mailing list <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<http://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive:	<http://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:	<http://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Errors-To:	cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com
Sender:	"Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com>
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id 02KLoYNc031926

Greetings, Eliot Moss!

>> I've reproduced your snags.  It/they are due to my having forgotten another
>> tiny update that should have been part of the 2.33.1-cygwin-cpuset.patch
>> file.  If you
>> 'echo "#define SYS_sched_getaffinity 42" > /usr/local/include/sys/syscall.h'
>> and then back out your other fix attempts, the build using cygport should work.

> What an amusing hack!  I especially like the sensibility of 42!  :-)

Because that's THE ANSWER!

> I will try this.  When I built it last night, I got a successful compile,
> but it didn't do anything.  For example, taskset 1 ls did not output
> _anything_ -- no error message and no ls output :-( ...

> It will be the weekend here in Australia (I'm visiting, and wondering about
> exactly how and when I will get home) so maybe I'll play with it some more
> on Saturday ...


-- 
With best regards,
Andrey Repin
Saturday, March 21, 2020 0:41:58

Sorry for my terrible english...
--
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -