delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-Original-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
DMARC-Filter: | OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org E958B385C017 |
Authentication-Results: | sourceware.org; |
dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=maxrnd.com | |
Authentication-Results: | sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=mark AT maxrnd DOT com |
Subject: | Re: Why is taskset still not in util-linux? |
To: | moss AT cs DOT umass DOT edu, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
References: | <1348011a-261a-2a87-d361-4e51fa8dc19f AT cs DOT umass DOT edu> |
<85ae12aa-6cc3-5d4c-5df2-25bf811ec6a9 AT maxrnd DOT com> | |
<72fea68a-b3d7-e87c-726f-8a5a2587a992 AT maxrnd DOT com> | |
<01e3d337-e5fe-f393-7634-3f1881bca315 AT cs DOT umass DOT edu> | |
From: | Mark Geisert <mark AT maxrnd DOT com> |
Message-ID: | <dca24f26-9da9-591c-19c1-8020e5de3a4e@maxrnd.com> |
Date: | Thu, 19 Mar 2020 16:29:46 -0700 |
User-Agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 |
Firefox/52.0 SeaMonkey/2.49.4 | |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <01e3d337-e5fe-f393-7634-3f1881bca315@cs.umass.edu> |
X-Spam-Status: | No, score=1.0 required=5.0 tests=KAM_DMARC_STATUS, |
KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, SPF_HELO_NONE, | |
SPF_NONE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 | |
X-Spam-Level: | * |
X-Spam-Checker-Version: | SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on |
server2.sourceware.org | |
X-BeenThere: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
X-Mailman-Version: | 2.1.29 |
List-Id: | Cygwin mailing list <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Unsubscribe: | <http://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>, |
<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe> | |
List-Archive: | <http://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help> |
List-Subscribe: | <http://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>, |
<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe> | |
Errors-To: | cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com |
Sender: | "Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com> |
X-MIME-Autoconverted: | from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id 02JNUSQq023217 |
Eliot Moss wrote: > On 3/16/2020 7:34 PM, Mark Geisert wrote: > > Mark Geisert wrote: > >> Eliot Moss wrote: > >>> > >>> Dear cygwin-ers -- > >>> > >>> Something I had asked about a while ago was the absence os taskset in cygwin's > >>> util-linux. At the time, it was pointed out that the necessary get/set > >>> affinity library/system calls were not yet supported. These were added a > >>> while ago, so it would seem that taskset ought to work. In fact, I think > >>> someone got it going on their own. Can we add it to util-linux now, > >>> officially? I think this was intended but perhaps was overlooked or > >>> something. > >> > >> Report noted; thanks. A solution is being worked. > > > > There's been no forward progress on this. If you're comfortable getting the > util-linux source > > package through Cygwin setup*.exe, you can follow the steps shown in > > https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin-apps/2020-March/039855.html to build > (with cygport) a local copy > > of util-linux that includes a taskset.exe you can move into /usr/local/bin, > for example. > > > > You might try that route if you're up for it. Feel free to ask questions > here if you hit a snag. > > HTH, > > Thank you, Mark. I decided to give it a try and got some distance, but hit a snag. > > First, I had to change configure.ac to add control to disable ionice (Cygwin > does not support a required syscall) while still trying to build taskset. > Previously taskset and ionice (and one other program) were controlled by the > single --enable-schedutils. > > Now, including sched.h does not provide the prototypes for sched_getaffinity, > etc. I found a previous post that suggests we need to do -D_GNU_SOURCE for it > to work. I am not sure of the best place to stick that, but I will see about > maybe a one line patch to taskset.c or something. Rats. Sorry you've hit some snags. Are you compiling directly with 'make' or the preferred 'cygport util-linux.cygport build'? With the latter I didn't need to make any changes to the source tree; all mods were accomplished with the new patch file and changes to util-linux.cygport itself. ..mark -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |