X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Achim Gratz <Stromeko AT nexgo DOT de>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: gcc and 128-bit compare/exchange
References:	<ab69ca04-06a2-eeb9-4771-e37432b59a77 AT cs DOT umass DOT edu>
	<f27b324f-049c-7830-68cd-14813aab6eed AT cs DOT umass DOT edu>
	<66f51c13-4c87-3bd6-3b8e-01901155ef2a AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca>
	<de26ff04-596e-1dad-f2ae-4b91ba53f5c1 AT cs DOT umass DOT edu>
	<0a2c77b2-7ff2-8118-8631-29d186184ad9 AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca>
	<0fc8a150-99b1-34dc-0dfb-a096fc3b2096 AT cs DOT umass DOT edu>
Date:	Wed, 11 Mar 2020 18:31:26 +0100
In-Reply-To:	<0fc8a150-99b1-34dc-0dfb-a096fc3b2096@cs.umass.edu> (Eliot Moss's
	message of "Wed, 11 Mar 2020 02:13:40 -0400")
Message-ID:	<87imjalrwx.fsf@Rainer.invalid>
User-Agent:	Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-VADE-STATUS:	LEGIT
X-Spam-Status:	No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,
	SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version:	SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
	server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version:	2.1.29
List-Id:	Cygwin mailing list <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<http://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive:	<http://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:	<http://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To:	cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com
Sender:	"Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com>

Eliot Moss writes:
> What I am really reporting is that Cygwin is giving the pthread mutex form
> when it should not be.  My CPU clearly has the capability, and the compiler clearly
> knows how to emit the instruction, since the __sync form does it.  What is
> mysterious and tangled is why libatomic / libc are not delivering the desired
> version of the atomic compare-exchange function.

Assuming you want to use a library, it would have to detect this
capability at runtime (unless you force-build for a single CPU
architecture) and dispatch different code based on the result.  It's
probably the latter part that's missing on Cygwin.


Regards,
Achim.
-- 
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+

SD adaptations for Waldorf Q V3.00R3 and Q+ V3.54R2:
http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSDada
--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -