Mail Archives: cygwin/2020/03/10/17:14:54
On 3/10/2020 4:35 PM, Brian Inglis wrote:
> On 2020-03-08 20:59, Eliot Moss wrote:
>> On 3/8/2020 10:29 PM, Eliot Moss wrote:
>>> This is probably to the gcc maintainer ...
>>>
>>> I am running on a processor that has compare/exchange 128-bit (cx16 capability),
>>> and I compiler with -mcx16 and -latomic. I'm on the latest release cygwin gcc
>>> (9.2.0-3, I believe) and the corresponding libatomic. I have a program with
>>> this in it:
>>>
>>> __atomic_compare_exchange((__int128 *)&s1, (__int128 *)&z, (__int128 *)&s2, 0,
>>> __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST, __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST);
>>>
>>> This compiles to a call (nice if it would inline, but ...) to
>>> __atomic_compare_exchange_16, which uses mutex's, not the CMPXCHG16B
>>> instruction I was hoping for. Note I am doing dynamic linking,
>>> which on at least one other platform results in dynamic selection
>>> of a lib_at implementation of the compare/exchange, which does use
>>> the desired instruction.
>>>
>>> Is this a limitation of cygwin gcc, or should I be doing something
>>> different to achieve the desired effect?
>>>
>>> Obviously it would be best not to going an asm inline if I can avoid it,
>>> but I suppose I can dig into the libatomic source to get the right
>>> incantation for it if need be ...
>>
>> A quick followup: I was able to get __sync_val_compare_and_swap_16 to work
>> (and its bool form). That will do for now, though of course it's deprecated.
>
> You just needed to go to the next info page:
>
> $ info gcc __atomic
>
> and use:
>
> #include <stdatomic.h>
> extern bool __atomic_compare_exchange ( TYPE *ptr,
> TYPE *expected,
> TYPE *desired,
> bool weak,
> int success_memorder,
> int failure_memorder);
>
> or higher level macro:
>
> atomic_compare_exchange_strong(PTR, VAL, DES)
>
> defined in /lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-cygwin/*/include/stdatomic.h
That is what I was already doing :-) .... it compiles and runs,
landing at libat_compare_exchange_16, which uses mutexes, not the
16-byte compare-exchange instruction. So how do I get the compare-
exchange instruction to be used in the library?
Regards - EM
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
- Raw text -