X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:reply-to:subject:to:references:from:message-id
	:date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=YfdZos2CQkIgnCvb
	64KIhFnRsyDlC9pzDrUH3X9XeuqgQklybsqU7OLtO48GvyqV0BjlnptNCy36FzfO
	SUxmQlHfXATEzChDGKsyqJ3/3gQXEeZ9NdpUl6UhENoKidNHYcxqeEogpf6NID2T
	5697VxV8Bar+L4S04sNXCXn9Uco=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:reply-to:subject:to:references:from:message-id
	:date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=V6oIHaFwxYHpMySC6FiABf
	EqJCo=; b=UN7tePiXMko8SomPCQJc/psbe4cWdm3FavMS7mUfYt6wC3Cl2KLjlo
	+8PH31wS8A2ite7w1yrLQu+TeyXkiKPVoVxpMkVjK6XWNPCgzESsAkO2BZ618lVV
	UJCw3LLI2lDtkq01CPlzNAy54O98Gc8l+44k2ZGAljx1xDVowAvA8=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=
X-HELO:	smtp-out-no.shaw.ca
Reply-To:	Brian DOT Inglis AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca
Subject:	Re: hardlinks on directories?
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20200130181516 DOT GA29782 AT tik DOT uni-stuttgart DOT de> <f0e439a1-652d-ad83-54c3-87c6661df8f7 AT redhat DOT com> <20200131101755 DOT GA5074 AT tik DOT uni-stuttgart DOT de>
From:	Brian Inglis <Brian DOT Inglis AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca>
Message-ID:	<bd6b2c71-670b-6d1b-fc01-10e5d0f033d5@SystematicSw.ab.ca>
Date:	Fri, 31 Jan 2020 07:59:01 -0700
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20200131101755.GA5074@tik.uni-stuttgart.de>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

On 2020-01-31 03:17, Ulli Horlacher wrote:
> On Thu 2020-01-30 (12:26), Eric Blake wrote:
> 
>>> Are this directory hard links?
>>
>> No, rather they are parallel mount points (the same directory mounted 
>> under two different names).
> 
> /: mount
> C:/cygwin64/bin on /usr/bin type ntfs (binary,auto)
> C:/cygwin64/lib on /usr/lib type ntfs (binary,auto)
> C:/cygwin64 on / type ntfs (binary,auto)
> C: on /cygdrive/c type ntfs (binary,posix=0,user,noumount,auto)
> 
> That's it! Thanks!
> 
> But why does Cygwin mount the directories /usr/bin and /usr/lib extra?

$ cmd /c dir `cygpath -aw /usr`
...
2020-01-30  17:51    <DIR>          include
2020-01-19  13:55    <DIR>          libexec
2019-09-29  13:38    <DIR>          local
2020-01-19  13:55    <DIR>          sbin
2020-01-19  13:56    <DIR>          share
2016-10-25  14:43    <DIR>          src
2019-12-18  11:07    <DIR>          tmp
...

No /usr/bin nor /usr/lib.

> Why not a symbolic link?

Mounts ensure the paths exist and are identical to /bin /lib.

> And which process does this mounting?

Every Cygwin process at startup performs those mounts and any alternatives in
/etc/fstab and /etc/fstab.d/*, see "Cygwin User's Guide", Chapter 3. Using
Cygwin, /The Cygwin Mount Table/:

	http://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/using.html#mount-table

-- 
Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

This email may be disturbing to some readers as it contains
too much technical detail. Reader discretion is advised.

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -