X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:from:to:subject:references:date:in-reply-to
	:message-id:mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=bCory
	Rm41Wm6hqGQ2IM7qfldpMNdzgaUUTTYLknxlWt1J/4k0qApuoQy6f8K8VhQkxLQA
	vvGRxzXvUqy7KkXixvCuOCYVG7uKNequopTrAgpT1e0B/vaHviObhMIVUQg4Beew
	88f/9SPmBmeszysy01INNwNrj5yOPfY10AQNvk=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:from:to:subject:references:date:in-reply-to
	:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=default; bh=JJzqpHDe5+Z
	mEJ6plIv9ZKtYeqA=; b=tI3TaFWeJx2WmjVwmH1qkmRW1upmHrxuJbsyM+tG5mH
	cmk9EIvV2pdH39wXEFxK1stuGtAA3dbBxCykDItc5Ph3pGW+ZK/fhKLXxNvUAf0E
	1Ap+0HM5T+3fduVoWIWd3k1jG3yoQB7Ixw8pOZ5n5NsmIbmU5Nb+InOAFsxRj+aU
	=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=manifest, H*i:sk:9b37097, H*f:sk:9b37097, behaves
X-HELO:	vsmx009.vodafonemail.xion.oxcs.net
From:	ASSI <Stromeko AT nexgo DOT de>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: headache on build repeatibility: octave vs BLODA ?
References:	<2904b4fa-6349-bd3e-c4ff-4b32a0bb3838 AT gmail DOT com> <87y2tvs278 DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid> <9b370970-fcfe-cca9-321f-973de777642a AT gmail DOT com>
Date:	Sun, 26 Jan 2020 09:05:34 +0100
In-Reply-To:	<9b370970-fcfe-cca9-321f-973de777642a@gmail.com> (Marco Atzeri's message of "Sun, 26 Jan 2020 07:58:29 +0100")
Message-ID:	<878sluhcc1.fsf@Otto.invalid>
User-Agent:	Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version:	1.0

Marco Atzeri writes:
> at least I know that is not just my machine.
> When I released the package was
>
>
>   libinterp/corefcn/file-io.cc-tst
> ............................... PASS 90/90

Based on the test name there may be an assumption built into the code
about how the filesystem behaves that isn't guaranteed on Windows/Cygwin
or even POSIX.  If it's simply an error condition not getting checked it
should be reproducible under debugging, but you're mostly out of luck if
it's relying on a specific order or atomicity of certain operations, as
debugging will almost always serialize the execution to the point where
these types of errors do not manifest.


Regards,
Achim.
-- 
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+

SD adaptation for Waldorf rackAttack V1.04R1:
http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSDada

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -