X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject
	:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=Sj2SOO43Ly1QuZE8
	4UHxdjgkm4eE2EhS9K326Zb52Di7PlwoVstR94yXQEOtETkh+E4LDwtHhMKP9iI7
	+JGKGzlPQJOHgLfFxA9WS4M1iryKda9yQsG8G6QZN+Ijd1q7gwONHWDgZV90QMaG
	pR8KgMYc6EJPAme/EUUEF2piC1U=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject
	:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=O6u40GVHbEs14iaXEejHoM
	v6Pr0=; b=AXDurCPWZA8v+oYSYk/ENzFfqV0bjqc0/BL3XoYwxHeAGscNxF+lbw
	7dXZFyACqwrwRpJocEjE5Lo2Aa+jSlz3O6cOGzCw9AbCfQPdixOndPTc+ywUZL1x
	8/OFChYhTl4F1ddSrkt8Soe1cf4818Pk08RCFzqDNwA1TMN0xKeo0=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_SHORT,KAM_THEBAT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.1 spammy=HX-Priority:Normal, H*F:D*yandex.ru, H*UA:Bat!, H*F:D*ru
X-HELO:	forward101p.mail.yandex.net
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1568055902; bh=YZT/VFhCKuf56KkgY2Jsd3y8Wx5DlJXFIxCXbxzXAWE=; h=In-Reply-To:Subject:To:Reply-To:From:Message-ID:References:Date; b=Mha+rzLUgGjZCUBrm9Hv7C4vynC+7jwNX2dhRNbgfVOeP23xszyUxSFCpuQTHIVKX H2cyKchbtxZ1Bbu/6AorFk46U2PvWwQP0c4fWfTsS7bHzKlKmFuT6OdbYkkk9TFAuY IY++V7UjEuUlvOIBs/4upQuJhuQ+REjBRTH6Mw/k=
Authentication-Results:	mxback29j.mail.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.ru
Date:	Mon, 9 Sep 2019 21:56:27 +0300
From:	Andrey Repin <anrdaemon AT yandex DOT ru>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<504917608.20190909215627@yandex.ru>
To:	Duncan Roe <duncan_roe AT optusnet DOT com DOT au>, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Command line processing in dcrt0.cc does not match Microsoft parsing rules
In-Reply-To:	<20190909182654.GA12686@dimstar.local.net>
References:	<MWHPR21MB08452919F35B1B0C5F0EB4DCB9BD0 AT MWHPR21MB0845 DOT namprd21 DOT prod DOT outlook DOT com> <MWHPR21MB0845F78385792965A94E0CD9B9BD0 AT MWHPR21MB0845 DOT namprd21 DOT prod DOT outlook DOT com> <MWHPR21MB084508155AB621C7AD81309CB9B90 AT MWHPR21MB0845 DOT namprd21 DOT prod DOT outlook DOT com> <MWHPR21MB08456D9F03AF8BD450E6AB2EB9B80 AT MWHPR21MB0845 DOT namprd21 DOT prod DOT outlook DOT com> <MWHPR21MB0845282E7582DC95ADF0F140B9BB0 AT MWHPR21MB0845 DOT namprd21 DOT prod DOT outlook DOT com> <135817606 DOT 20190906233445 AT yandex DOT ru> <CY4PR21MB0838765A912890C93D4F223DB9B70 AT CY4PR21MB0838 DOT namprd21 DOT prod DOT outlook DOT com> <CY4PR21MB08388C6AF65D78D5FE3E68DDB9B70 AT CY4PR21MB0838 DOT namprd21 DOT prod DOT outlook DOT com> <cd9940c6-8eec-8cc9-7377-8428f3b220fc AT redhat DOT com> <20190909182654 DOT GA12686 AT dimstar DOT local DOT net>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

Greetings, Duncan Roe!

> On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 11:57:21AM -0500, Eric Blake wrote:
>> On 9/9/19 11:47 AM, Stephen Provine via cygwin wrote:
>> > Argh, my mistake about top posting again. My email client does not help me
>> > with this by default and I have to manually construct quoting of previous
>> > responses and delete what shouldn't be there (and missed it again). If there's
>> > any way for someone to delete my previous message from the archive, please do.
>> >
>> > Why doesn't Cygwin utilize Github or something else more modern to manage issues?
>>
>> Just because it is "modern" does not necessarily make it better.
>>
>> https://www.gnu.org/software/repo-criteria-evaluation.en.html
>>
>> ranks github as worse than gitlab, in part because there is no way to
>> use the full power of github without surrendering to the use of non-free
>> software.

> No problems with that. I think though, that the OP's point was to use *git*
> (wherever the repo may be).

Cygwin uses Git. Just not GitHub.
The question was to manage ISSUES, though.
And the answer is, this list was working just fine for the purpose so far.
There's no pressing need to change that, last I heard.


-- 
With best regards,
Andrey Repin
Monday, September 9, 2019 21:55:23

Sorry for my terrible english...


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -