delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2019/08/28/09:37:35

X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=ubgn
bp7s4n9zkPFR8T1M2Ab2RweVkzME3ssRjSH0wJ9JYtSju+BdiY5AzuBi1nC2rmGj
aXxs8pSpNvVgAcImNMGKvh4poGzUn6LjP1uF92xqA9vBsEeBplqbYEQWPfwJV7h5
23kWR02LgIZA41O+ef89C4BHHFuOhPDKLrg3rds=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type; s=default; bh=hIAvl4mFQy
Dp3HRZai1yxEMOeR0=; b=jnG2OGW5oR/gvGKCauO44G5jBlJvGxk2uIATi4nMjg
R/v2mefWBnTbzNGTbzibk5Brzk1VGFBYYj8bNMc84BTUvzMNKXwxt7qTmA8sNAni
5uF530UZoA8lDk1fjsipJCLhbWAeDoxEf/OvxbESxt1bNPdD3cCCFWelawVsVvcS
E=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=
X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Odd, is it not? mkdir 'e:\' cannot be undone by rmdir 'e:\' ...
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <bc3df101ab93c20b86c3ab7fa7d3ea4f AT xs4all DOT nl> <20190827152549 DOT GY11632 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <a47cc167b725c08e6f1c914166fabcaf AT smtp-cloud8 DOT xs4all DOT net> <3E262D05-F393-453A-9E43-B248DDE50812 AT solidrocksystems DOT com> <b97e4dbe952154efc68412540514ae81 AT smtp-cloud8 DOT xs4all DOT net> <20190828125939 DOT GL11632 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
From: Eric Blake <eblake AT redhat DOT com>
Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
Message-ID: <421ac447-b249-da21-1ca5-228041cfc884@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 08:36:41 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20190828125939.GL11632@calimero.vinschen.de>
X-IsSubscribed: yes

--JNqU72IbvBM8GcnG5C5WFeHsDUswI5mV6
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="V2q6vqQW4tAbrjGUQ6PzPJNT4uMfWkpAX";
 protected-headers="v1"
From: Eric Blake <eblake AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <421ac447-b249-da21-1ca5-228041cfc884 AT redhat DOT com>
Subject: Re: Odd, is it not? mkdir 'e:\' cannot be undone by rmdir 'e:\' ...
References: <bc3df101ab93c20b86c3ab7fa7d3ea4f AT xs4all DOT nl>
 <20190827152549 DOT GY11632 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
 <a47cc167b725c08e6f1c914166fabcaf AT smtp-cloud8 DOT xs4all DOT net>
 <3E262D05-F393-453A-9E43-B248DDE50812 AT solidrocksystems DOT com>
 <b97e4dbe952154efc68412540514ae81 AT smtp-cloud8 DOT xs4all DOT net>
 <20190828125939 DOT GL11632 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
In-Reply-To: <20190828125939 DOT GL11632 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>


--V2q6vqQW4tAbrjGUQ6PzPJNT4uMfWkpAX
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 8/28/19 7:59 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:

>>>>> mkdir(2) has some special code from 2009 which drops trailing
>>>>> {back}slashes to perform a bordercase in mkdir Linux-compatible.
>>>>> This code snippet doesn't exist in rmdir(2).

Dropping trailing slashes to be Linux-compatible is okay.  Dropping
trailing backslashes is risky, though, if it makes us forget that the
user was asking for a DOS path (even though DOS paths are not always
going to work as expected).


>=20
> Eric, any insight?  As usual our comments from way back when are lacking
> in terms of what exact problem this code is trying to fix/workaround.

If I recall, we had cases where 'mkdir a/' and 'mkdir a' did not behave
identically, even though POSIX says they should; compounded by the fact
that Windows treats trailing slash differently when performing native
mkdir on a drive than it does on a subdirectory of a drive.

It may be as simple as changing the isdirsep() from the identified
commit to instead check only for '/' (and ignore '\').

>=20
> Given this case, I wonder if we really need this code or if we can't
> just drop it.  Of course, it would be great to learn what bordercase
> this code was trying to handle and if there isn't another way to do that.
>=20
>=20
> Corinna
>=20

--=20
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.           +1-919-301-3226
Virtualization:  qemu.org | libvirt.org


--V2q6vqQW4tAbrjGUQ6PzPJNT4uMfWkpAX--

--JNqU72IbvBM8GcnG5C5WFeHsDUswI5mV6
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEccLMIrHEYCkn0vOqp6FrSiUnQ2oFAl1mg2kACgkQp6FrSiUn
Q2relQgAqHIASHcD0vE0YYfQYdfXSmlZVXaLgIVRP/+LnrSG6SRqU0m2qjQRBk74
pYy698zpbcjjATqOq4CdFHitxltGUx3Wi7ZCWTuiSQ9LtQ2ve6BWPJebYK5KHiK/
pHMiTkYvce3qrTF8kpn7+6dgS7wZzD9v1nCWM1vBF9eeB51A9hkPE4yj3c6XnUii
/0BVU15hmv2OTKv5+HrnHHFi/2b+7g7bDi5SVgT4b9v4fB8YXEqhz6Ku0UPb6Gp+
cd7fXvWMV/uM+1KNukmQIlh7eGJ/FtaS4ch6QmxMoRYOqnV0bbBAAf4K8lfSGvFS
0stTafC+2Wzj3DWI/tRoJ9MOMjx7eA==
=PQfp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--JNqU72IbvBM8GcnG5C5WFeHsDUswI5mV6--

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019