delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2019/08/28/08:53:52

X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
:list-help:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to
:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
default; b=E2jdahGpb3IokvI3xkFlVd/HaqOteWUlc9BLUKAqt5RDxC+EnrS0b
nkQPNZ1Jx4vnFLqOjkwGCMPfy8jcJvXgxv/JP3hzM3aKMMqsquV98l35tE6K2aQU
/DSRDvHKyXiWBOAYTYHdoCi+L70RU046OKItIhH23il5PL9nPtawx0=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
:list-help:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to
:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default;
bh=MEVcUXuvK6jubDZjY3DbSSSdUfc=; b=bupC4HO3ubPfxTyWDcsMI+jDvikL
2tOzMVUcAi07fRXs3AC8ektHEeZT6Mbc+kpz2RHDJeFGj4cYAPVqQPe11vCpayq4
IIFMLYg3655MQkivYIOD6xPtiIGBTCGMN3PMUiAbcLgHABpj4OdIA6JbB58mu+Ea
z4nbqxzxoZ7xbVY=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-104.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,GIT_PATCH_2,GOOD_FROM_CORINNA_CYGWIN,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=MESSAGE, cygwin-announce, cygwinannounce, SECURITY
X-HELO: mout.kundenserver.de
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 14:52:57 +0200
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: Matthias Andree <matthias DOT andree AT gmx DOT de>
Cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: HEADS UP package "fetchmail" vulnerable and 6.4.0 release candidate out
Message-ID: <20190828125257.GJ11632@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: Matthias Andree <matthias DOT andree AT gmx DOT de>, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <18a325b3-0934-0e7f-aa6b-45828ae03ce7 AT gmx DOT de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <18a325b3-0934-0e7f-aa6b-45828ae03ce7@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.3 (2019-02-01)

--jTIjG9KbdIQeEVp/
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Matthias,

On Aug 20 19:49, Matthias Andree wrote:
>=20
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>=20
> Corinna, and everyone else who is interested,
>=20
> checking <https://cygwin.com/packages/summary/fetchmail.html>,
> I see that Cygwin packages a very old fetchmail version that has unfixed
> security vulnerabilities and unfixed critical (data loss) bugs.
>=20
> Constructively moving forward, please:
>=20
> 1. I am about to release 6.4.0 in a few weeks' time with a few important
> SSL/TLS/OpenSSL updates that permit newer OpenSSL versions, require
> OpenSSL v1.0.2, and practically permit TLS v1.3 if linked against a
> sufficiently new OpenSSL.
> We're shy of 200 commits since the last formal release 6.3.26, and 276
> changes past 6.3.21, the younger x86 (32bit) package for Cygwin.
> High-level details in the NEWS file linked below. Care was taken to not
> break the interfaces too hard, but in the sense of security, I carefully
> changed --sslproto semantics and flipped the switch
>=20
> 2. Note that fetchmail has seen several SECURITY and CRITICAL bug fixes
> since 6.3.21/6.3.22.
> Review <https://gitlab.com/fetchmail/fetchmail/blob/legacy_64/NEWS> for
> details, and look for these two capitalized words.
>=20
> 3. Please try to package 6.4.0.rc2 for x86 and x86_64 against Cygwin's
> libssl1.1, and see if you find any portability issues that would require
> fixing before 6.4.0. Deadline end of August 2019, and unless really
> needed for non-trivial code changes, rc2 is also the planned final
> candidate.

Builds fine against OpenSSL-1.1.  I can't test it ATM, but I prepared
a test release of the current rc3 for our users

  https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2019-08/msg00022.html


Thanks,
Corinna

--=20
Corinna Vinschen
Cygwin Maintainer

--jTIjG9KbdIQeEVp/
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=PfD8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--jTIjG9KbdIQeEVp/--

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019