X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=gHAT62mZM4iL4a51
	ksDnmHtszk3XQUIykT0+xKwlrd6KeCjgXT0UZU0z5fRYfoZ3ngnoOK1kg5gyDdfK
	IyMbpHu2g19QLaCrAnWEkGM/5rQYSX9SEBpiCBRbfpk1WlU9CI/XtXcZwYWIulIr
	e7W52NA20N4lYlS2x0N1x+GQSpk=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=MwmAS64ZO6HzNHgfYKZPVL
	Tw3vA=; b=ZVPwqvVHyoDWBCWlzapoRvnkXOl6AbxTj4nIedpK3SV9tpa3yp5M9Z
	FGo0b1Drx9EN1mk+2UQC9HNUjAGmMNOSCq2iZdhWMsYJvdzlARe+8gjOGpgmR+AH
	v5W4VdoHde+QglbdQyvPB2GmYFAAdXrKQKnnYhrJyb0SWE2xTQzjY=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.1 spammy=prototyping, 4.2, earth, students
X-HELO:	eddie.starwolf.com
Subject:	Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] tcsh 6.21.00-1
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<announce DOT 20190617114548 DOT 32299-1-corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> <DB7PR01MB538635A91B6AD46AF72E46D4DEEB0 AT DB7PR01MB5386 DOT eurprd01 DOT prod DOT exchangelabs DOT com> <CAEhDDbALQSuTO1aky95F_-cPd0R0WwXZE3H2mM=hD1h5w5SYPg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <c25fbe33-05bd-ab4a-0f11-90907ef3cf59 AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca>
From:	Greywolf <greywolf AT starwolf DOT com>
Message-ID:	<2ec62274-cf38-5fff-4fb8-f0093d9ba408@starwolf.com>
Date:	Mon, 17 Jun 2019 19:27:45 -0700
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.1
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<c25fbe33-05bd-ab4a-0f11-90907ef3cf59@SystematicSw.ab.ca>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

On 2019-06-17 09:11, Brian Inglis wrote:
> 
> On 2019-06-17 07:13, Csaba Raduly wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 2:12 PM Jose Isaias Cabrera  wrote:
>>> Just wondering... Does anyone still uses tcsh?  That was my favorite shell
>>> before bash.
>> There are always pockets of resistance, hiding out in the mountains
>> (-: server rooms, etc :-)
> 
> Some of us were lured to csh on SunOS by mentions of C-like features (still
> looking for those) and used tcsh on other systems, before coming to our senses
> when POSIX standardized based on Bourne/Korn shell features, and appreciating
> the kitchen sink inclusive implementation of interactive shell features provided
> by bash.
> 

Some of us were lured to csh on BSD 4.2 because sh was primitive as all 
get-out -- no functions, no aliases; the only thing it had going for it was 
better signal trapping.  Where I was, a few students implemented 'dsh', a 
follow-on to 'csh', which had ESC-based pathname, user, ~user, and envariable 
expansion (ran in cbrk mode), and a few other things (and some really goofy 
error messages).  I inherited it and immediately declared it dead upon the 
arrival on scene by tcsh, which I then abandoned once I discovered bash, since 
I wanted to have a CLI which resembled my primary prototyping language.

[ksh, on the other hand, is welcome to fall off the face of the earth at any 
unannounced moment...]

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -