X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:reply-to:subject:to:references:from:message-id
	:date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=L69lSvpk4S4Gvt4j
	UgOMRuPUQN65p8miSBKwXD6kMXIH2qhUgikTtu0I/1JpXs19iSxzXHqFcPSVbku3
	2EYCqt3EYLDc1sJlYzCBpolf+nOEnPCHGqhMG2ZazZJaKyWzmYIvp+SZjNKryjtK
	IdnlVKfgsxrnsxfbubNKA100Cg8=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:reply-to:subject:to:references:from:message-id
	:date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=TcwA1V+ZwFAe1usGEB9t64
	ES65I=; b=FVOm/2W+XKIUIn2uF+6pZh13esnG1Q5dF+IM2wb7jqBguyovdefcmq
	ZgtG0RF54W3sv5041kjs2NemgBix2Ms/MEe2iMw3ygkS5UFljzml3OGQlvkY087I
	VHUc94v7eIGCeZISn4dvQmhiGnEskGs1e+wTxFcdxftmyDPpW40I8=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=techniques, reconfiguring, rights
X-HELO:	smtp-out-so.shaw.ca
Reply-To:	Brian DOT Inglis AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca
Subject:	Re: Question regarding OpenSSL 1.1.1b package configuration against OpenSSL 1.0.2r
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<51f3bec1-cd1e-cda9-31ed-174b09c763f6 AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca> <5cf6f6fe DOT 1c69fb81 DOT 9ba14 DOT 25bc AT mx DOT google DOT com> <05CCBA43-50CC-4B46-A707-27CAB735D348 AT solidrocksystems DOT com> <5e8f901b867540d8ed4eb38229c93324 AT smtp-cloud7 DOT xs4all DOT net>
From:	Brian Inglis <Brian DOT Inglis AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca>
Openpgp:	preference=signencrypt
Message-ID:	<2e1ace14-97d0-9ad9-0a90-c312a9c22470@SystematicSw.ab.ca>
Date:	Wed, 5 Jun 2019 00:24:06 -0600
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<5e8f901b867540d8ed4eb38229c93324@smtp-cloud7.xs4all.net>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

On 2019-06-04 22:26, Houder wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Jun 2019 22:04:16, Vince Rice  wrote:
>> It's cygport, he doesn't have to know about compiling C. ...
> Vince, this utter nonsense, and you know it!

He hopefully should not, just rebuilding and reconfiguring an existing source
package, with current tools.

C difficulties normally occur after compiler upgrades.
Most cygport issues revolve around autotools, autoconfig, automake, and require
conversations with upstream for joint resolution across systems.

If he has difficulties, he could post here, and we'd help.
Anyway, he appears to have been successful.

RFC IPR section comments "implementations based on these domain parameters may
require use of inventions covered by patent rights. In particular, techniques
for an efficient arithmetic exploiting the special parameters of the twisted
curves may be covered by patents."
Certicom Research published a number of papers on efficient Brainpool ECCs.
The OP may want to run that by his org's legal IP group.

-- 
Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

This email may be disturbing to some readers as it contains
too much technical detail. Reader discretion is advised.

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -