X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:to:from:subject:message-id:date:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=U3t
	9K4c7xkte7WJ8uWEuk9Jy1JMsXujKyKJTgVLZa7w3GEuUhUaI3Q993S3HVGK2le+
	+O51v/zJXjiJMEHCGExpMM6FgEQ6KSG3yC8Yri5uayNnKqYuQSOokwl94MjdUxGC
	lByir6VCwvi/8RV/wXLDEFUaCfks4bN/Ulm+NaGI=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:to:from:subject:message-id:date:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=oxwPe3DB3
	FAuZfE3VDB/oQf2E2k=; b=OQCR1kOGU9GbC6NcDYDHbb5JG484IqVNjz3mZY3lH
	pCVHe5XpkuQy49gSlCLlAxTc0xkXn+WgjcnVUSgpjMYd770tjYD8IO9Ovin9Cee3
	tI3cFOBUXjW3JpyVjhWW1CzPPEXn8K/NkXDUdvpSBk79Kz+HZYWHHcCZWwQweARy
	Lw=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=H*F:U*cygwin, scratch, article, our
X-HELO:	smtp.webfaction.com
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Bob Cochran <cygwin AT mindchasers DOT com>
Subject:	Is our use of Cygwin to build & run OpenOCD a good one?
Message-ID:	<ad7a93aa-d688-d177-bdf2-d368f2acbbd0@mindchasers.com>
Date:	Sun, 19 May 2019 15:43:56 -0400
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

Hi,

In case you're not familiar with it, OpenOCD is a hardware debugger that 
natively runs on Linux:  http://openocd.org/

We use it for embedded hardware development in debugging our ARM and 
FPGA code via JTAG (e.g., set breakpoints, step through code, etc.).   
For our use, it interfaces to our hardware via an FTDI USB-based JTAG 
controller.

We recently wrote up our process on building OpenOCD using Cygwin on 
Windows 10 and shared it on the OpenOCD mail list.   And, I received the 
following feedback:

"Cygwin? this is probably still functional, but now can be considered a 
(pre)historic solution."

I personally have been using Cygwin for many years and have come to 
trust it for interfacing to Linux and macOS boxes from Windows.  I think 
it's a great project, so when I wanted to build & run OpenOCD from 
scratch, I naturally went to Cygwin.

I would appreciate any feedback on our use of Cygwin for building & 
running OpenOCD: https://mindchasers.com/dev/openocd-darsena-windows

If fellow Cygwin users think it's a poor use case, then we'll pull the 
article.

Thanks!

Bob



--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -