X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:message-id
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=BxdwZGCDqfWkqukh7gxT5AedmNrVS7ly3JLNK27qNhhQ2MGaCW05o
	DovyQZ7z3G3kMwIPmCjFMu/W0G4TOm986JkJXtunnAFW5gntbsFPkk3ZzLHFXTHh
	5qEr/NgnKZ1RxOVPM/nLMBNmca1jOhmjhhLDu8SBrWiuQ4awd6FwoY=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:message-id
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default;
	bh=Pm6M5jFbtsKu6xteng5aLBJ9lWw=; b=HhV2O+JrqlcMW/7yIHeAJYystFBL
	a8LOPmIWY1CIn1FwQoQ2c1qOW0DZkC4i6EPQF4feqN4asFXg9Up9AksEbECrM52G
	1nUHrQi36gPf6F1YXzsyrS5h2rry0DeqEHoR9XdF1UsqSZ+wA1uoSX/QZLyXyrQN
	dakW8CeF4e94t8o=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.1 spammy=gran, Gran, Mike, somebody
X-HELO:	sonic315-14.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1557693220; bh=9hvC9Oa+ES1m+Q0hW9LJxWNK/tTR4LzogJXPZ21zoz8=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From:Subject; b=heD+a8ecYFD66pbxDhOiACx7h5P2EUk6erbnIcCVehiDW4A6ZvAFjU0tR5DeOWhGPehwEIqLxbDBaPkkY09jVsZUJniWcnfmhJB+u4dVophOtDkqTsFi8h1jj4V2e8zpOvkqyvHrDdOc+ZYnWa8nOkcrqQHA8WLnFBBGEtGHY8UesquyX7rC+BGuEiHhY5tFWPoA/0eDb6KbMI1NUcBK4JHMutnWIq5mJ2r/RXpERQ5lminwmvhdwVKp6S1QCXhRHT15FeZsUREkGVkafHZyITZ52rbr1elk40n8QA+p4gF4fyk9OnPBzXRFhtihLahiZhPgxE0fnF3sG7WJhkYn0g==
Date:	Sun, 12 May 2019 13:33:30 -0700
From:	"Mike Gran via cygwin" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To:	Mike Gran <spk121 AT yahoo DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Why is __unix__ defined, and not __WINDOWS__ ?
Message-ID:	<20190512203330.GA30710@spikycactus.attlocal.net>
References:	<5fbb6229-da17-c056-19b9-9819c684a8ad AT agner DOT org>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<5fbb6229-da17-c056-19b9-9819c684a8ad@agner.org>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.11.3 (2019-02-01)
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 08:22:36PM +0200, Agner Fog wrote:
> I have noticed that the gcc and clang compilers have defined the
> preprocessing macro __unix__, but not __WINDOWS__, _WIN32, or _WIN64 when
> compiling a windows executable.
> 
> Why is this?

As I understand it, when using the cygwin compiler to compile for the
cygwin target, these defines are intentionally not defined, because
Cygwin is supposed to look and feel like a Posix platform, not a
windows one.

The various MinGW compilers do define these constants because the target
is native windows.

I think these days the canonical defines are (somebody correct me if
I'm wrong)

  __CYGWIN__ for Cygwin

  _WIN32 as 1 on MinGW when the compilation target is Windows 32-bit
  ARM, 64-bit ARM, x86, or x64. Otherwise, undefined.

  _WIN64 as 1 on MinGW when the compilation target is Windows 64-bit
  ARM or x64. Otherwise, undefined

I am not a maintainer.

-
Mike Gran
 

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -