X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=uUtNJfPXRPXRJt+QbMq0azj/GJuczu4hG9y3zeC1sJ7W39nVO6ZWp
	EbReGivwU8/6D03Cu3+SMw3CWV1LwnA2/kNTaSFvDM61W2d7gN6IV22HGuycDNwI
	Wc1bAEqKQWThBNVNqRgHTGdUMgH1jsytOx6K2WgmTK6wT1STnc2dJs=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default;
	bh=EaH3nzGNq5FsJLAXAAOGBwdfQww=; b=cWQUbruGAmInx1VbyyFGz5ePaSou
	dnroDGFFkoXDNpx0zlyz6q9Fz1yjg+k54GLFNdNfboJFpBObSH8gCu1scUjysQVT
	uSS4GFZJbGKHMp69QrqwCtqRxnKM67w1VgwcryEJNrfS+K85c6BlshhPic0/t2g6
	kvH4zI19bKDHVVg=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-102.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,GOOD_FROM_CORINNA_CYGWIN,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=submission, wondering, H*F:D*cygwin.com
X-HELO:	mout.kundenserver.de
Date:	Tue, 23 Apr 2019 14:48:10 +0200
From:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: EPERM on bind() ?
Message-ID:	<20190423124810.GD30041@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<CAOTD34a_LJP5kk==DzkHz89PFjjPFcXWM1eDFVx+4uNf6XbCjw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAOTD34Yc=3023bXgKEpKkYehQPyiPdNn5SK9ZQR2rCCWqETU0w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<CAOTD34Yc=3023bXgKEpKkYehQPyiPdNn5SK9ZQR2rCCWqETU0w@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.11.3 (2019-02-01)

--BI5RvnYi6R4T2M87
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Apr 23 14:28, E. Madison Bray wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 2:17 PM E. Madison Bray wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have had some users of the Jupyter Notebook [1] on Cygwin report an
> > crash on startup where, when the Notebook server tries to bind() to
> > the port it will listen on (TCP 8888) the bind() fails and errno is
> > set to EPERM, which is not an expected errno from bind().
> >
> > Looking at the Cygwin sources, in net.cc I see that in
> > set_winsock_errno, EPERM is returned by default if there is some WSA
> > error for which there is no POSIX equivalent mapped.  Fine--EPERM is
> > as good as any other fallback I suppose (?) in that it unambiguously
> > indicates some unknown WSA error.
> >
> > I'm just wondering if anyone has any idea what might cause such an
> > error.  Some third-party firewall or BLODA?  I can't reproduce it
> > myself.  Trying to bind to a port already in use correctly returns
> > EADDRINUSE.
> >
> >
> > [1] https://jupyter.org/
>=20
> Answering my own question after comparing the list on
> https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/desktop/winsock/windows-sockets-=
error-codes-2
> to Cygwin's wsock_errmap table this is a likely culprit:
>=20
> > WSAEACCES
> > 10013
> > Permission denied.An attempt was made to access a socket in a way forbi=
dden by its access permissions.
> > An example is using a broadcast address for sendto without broadcast pe=
rmission being set using
> > setsockopt(SO_BROADCAST).
> > Another possible reason for the WSAEACCES error is that when the bind f=
unction is called (on Windows NT
> > 4.0 with SP4 and later), another application, service, or kernel mode d=
river is bound to the same address
> > with exclusive access. Such exclusive access is a new feature of Window=
s NT 4.0 with SP4 and later, and is
> > implemented by using the SO_EXCLUSIVEADDRUSE option.
>=20
> This appears to be missing from the wsock_errmap table, but should
> obviously map to EACCES.  I'll supply a patch.

Good catch!  As I *just* wrote in my other reply, we should better
default to EACCES.  It should be sufficient to change the default then.
I'm looking forward to your patch submission.


Thanks,
Corinna

--=20
Corinna Vinschen
Cygwin Maintainer

--BI5RvnYi6R4T2M87
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=eQnU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--BI5RvnYi6R4T2M87--

- Raw text -