X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:from:to:references:subject:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=is5H
	qBAaVxPNQ2onkdW4sdWKsZz0r7E4Ce2jR2fQYG0SHGBNl/DpFzz4NO5WITT2aQjG
	fwrpEDGYPxXgbRTE/A6bBH4++k4eimq75MiFowUadD8CWHL7VtRI+S+sKfxsvI63
	RHjXDV8GVCTTnP0hpn72Y5LzXy2nOnq3Idd/3Vk=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:from:to:references:subject:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type; s=default; bh=7d0bJhVS7H
	q2cvTvY2qSBut/2RY=; b=MQmLj8sN3gDyC/BG5XQXepXT+SkDx5bujG9AlLLROR
	Se1O3FQRhJhgZojauTWAbLlUi94fdk3zHSURRaSkJP6LXcaIu8HOYcSNhg7Tvu/U
	sczJp2Prb64bAtYPPv4ER0ishGuKvYO2dxMQXO8ogI+NkKaH/I8JjrfwURhGqUYr
	s=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.1 spammy=madison, H*RU:sk:broadba, HX-Spam-Relays-External:sk:broadba
X-HELO:	mail-lj1-f196.google.com
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:references:autocrypt:subject:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=mIl3XLQr+WxkEHSaFqbhtYhrMlLEYgap6jcMqbbAI2k=; b=bpDyiGQ5O0qOgvBN6x6NCjcjGMY9Hm7oPLt0SOq+jHhe6rBBpwNJ0gtziEI/8AeLk+ VoHm9LqDXdQRtrMA8nMISvHIdBTBRdE0XW8ISB4Q/l7eDAD52h54rB0tiANTSa4pOKLU C0Xlm3fYc35gGywEmav2js7euhSStzdJW584ZtS+2Eg/vbXtRmky8Zukvsserm4pSIHO RBVn8z3iJAWnyd46qrSeDuJQgxH0YlEH+pgTpzGUEElq0HA7s9qJ0RrDdm6u01njFEVm QC85n3oHziitQgSdu7TLGXMGUhoMsC40LzLHK0xfd6ZNzZhNx2Dox/op0wyaz2g3mx6U LENA==
From:	LRN <lrn1986 AT gmail DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<dddf240b-0569-1e28-2e53-a5c833e12644 AT gmail DOT com> <CAOTD34ZCHXu0yMNLLhWusM=zq=9S8McHacdwG2DVW+i1R8DQUA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <b91e6a4b-192c-7db2-1f16-8bf335a54607 AT gmail DOT com>
Subject:	Re: cygwin port of glib
Message-ID:	<18ed9090-2c35-cca2-4b7f-2d057a44b351@gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 3 Apr 2019 15:16:41 +0300
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<b91e6a4b-192c-7db2-1f16-8bf335a54607@gmail.com>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

--SKzj5fiaUl6XacMVzFnw3L467QKZ3wOWY
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="u22drptzld4WrDeZocBT0H0SU0fIsCLgS";
 protected-headers="v1"
From: LRN <lrn1986 AT gmail DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <18ed9090-2c35-cca2-4b7f-2d057a44b351 AT gmail DOT com>
Subject: Re: cygwin port of glib


--u22drptzld4WrDeZocBT0H0SU0fIsCLgS
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 05.03.2019 17:23, LRN wrote:
> On 05.03.2019 17:07, E. Madison Bray wrote:
>>
>> If they're clean, worthwhile patches then I absolutely think you
>> should get them integrated upstream if at all possible--that's almost
>> always preferable.
>=20
> Okay, i'll see what i can do.
>=20

Made some progress, but i would benefit from some input on a few things.

1) This[0] cygwinports commit and a related gnulib[1] commit. Which version=
 of
cygwin (CYGWIN_VERSION_API_MINOR) corresponds to 1.7 (is the 1.7 number even
correct?). As a less-intrusive fix, i can switch
#ifdef __CYGWIN__
to
#if defined(__CYGWIN) && (!defined (CYGWIN_VERSION_API_MINOR) ||
CYGWIN_VERSION_API_MINOR < somevalue)


2) This[2] cygwinports commit. I don't quite get what the author means. Doe=
s he
mean that returning a path that looks like "//etc" from parsing a URI
"file:////etc" is correct? Or the opposite, that it should return "/etc" ? =
The
commit seems to be saying one thing, while the code does something else.


[0]:
https://github.com/cygwinports/glib2.0/commit/b61abed9554ab813ed358ea5bad64=
8987573772e#diff-2d64c930085856723abe9a40105389abR256

[1]:
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/gnulib.git/commit/lib/localcharset.c?id=
=3D9f5ab735f030faf651961d55ce3b849dd56dcff3

[2]:
https://github.com/cygwinports/glib2.0/commit/40ca93c8ae81e7a05ec098246b43c=
e74e157ebd6#diff-c86c0d1edc7cdc043b8b01ee6e526817


--u22drptzld4WrDeZocBT0H0SU0fIsCLgS--

--SKzj5fiaUl6XacMVzFnw3L467QKZ3wOWY
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=I6z7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--SKzj5fiaUl6XacMVzFnw3L467QKZ3wOWY--

- Raw text -