X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=dqhmbgxbkErlTjOk
	vyn/ecUAEhiEl5jXkTlXBrCOpKfuNebgVkkua3btM9LNpUbOVoqb/NNJ/DqZHSkd
	vItph/Vf65x9ClH5VaNo9+10Pww3kx9i0ePMkP8cU8nxjiSGKDoiBPBqpNFN6My3
	NyxR6KmRFi5JNvoKxGC4qxx2kq0=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=bxTUcCLXCXjRQl2Lilz36f
	x+dtI=; b=q3bTtseoI/5dOzn0Qg2x9lpImZQZOtWmw7aLCV9tCEY1mHGskog13/
	JsWgP5JpxngBo4zk1JqKl/vSzCuQQXq49zIb1sN1t1E+MZIDmVpPAFgymTklp5jF
	SH5zk5k2fTiRyeC+VuOoaalxrPzPnoRvzvGZE08myaLJWC4Zh8eOg=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_NUMSUBJECT autolearn=no version=3.3.1 spammy=ticket, participate, HX-Languages-Length:797, H*UA:6.1
X-HELO:	m0.truegem.net
Subject:	Re: Patch request to qt 5.9.4
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<1439412702 DOT 1866573 DOT 1551653028041 DOT JavaMail DOT yahoo DOT ref AT mail DOT yahoo DOT co DOT jp> <1439412702 DOT 1866573 DOT 1551653028041 DOT JavaMail DOT yahoo AT mail DOT yahoo DOT co DOT jp> <0faa5fb55a0af4803fcdff786dba8be440355609 DOT camel AT cygwin DOT com> <1896876564.419596.1552373491409.JavaMail.yah <1346787976 DOT 482037 DOT 1552451229824 DOT JavaMail DOT yahoo AT mail DOT yahoo DOT co DOT jp> <Pine DOT BSF DOT 4 DOT 63 DOT 1903130118170 DOT 46302 AT m0 DOT truegem DOT net>
From:	Mark Geisert <mark AT maxrnd DOT com>
Message-ID:	<17710c05-3ccc-b8de-6b8b-db022c1f1ce3@maxrnd.com>
Date:	Fri, 15 Mar 2019 01:06:34 -0700
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:49.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/49.0 SeaMonkey/2.46
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.BSF.4.63.1903130118170.46302@m0.truegem.net>

Mark Geisert wrote:
> I believe I've found the root cause of this issue of outbound connect on a
> non-blocking socket not working under Cygwin.
[...]

Hi Tatsuro,
This Qt issue should be reported to their developers.  Do you have experience 
opening a ticket with them?  If so, please do so and let me know the ticket/bug 
number.  I will participate in discussion there.  I could also open a ticket 
myself if you prefer that I do it.

It seems to me that we should continue to apply your one-line patch that turns 
off O_NONBLOCK at that one Qt location, as a workaround for this Qt problem on 
Cygwin.  When the Qt devs fix the root cause and release a new Qt containing the 
fix, we can then remove our local patch.

..mark

Yaakov: Does this all sound reasonable to you?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -