delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2019/03/05/18:58:43

X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
:list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:to:message-id:in-reply-to
:references:subject:mime-version:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=BKZ55gY2bqwk5gNH
8D1Alk+nWJUldNRIz2Q3LcPOiDGDLtJZI6eSYtQVUkcmQd36MeHSekqPW4dFzCzc
OvjYHEWJBzvm/Xm5iDAO70qvAaIv4DAz4Kym34dwbSp4E6c1S2z4LHC2sk2vtsOT
U2pzaRZlZUGb+d3ZOiSujeIXWts=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
:list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:to:message-id:in-reply-to
:references:subject:mime-version:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=ecPMdyHXS5zsncP17La4IS
T/f6M=; b=Xein00ehN92TDDG4NI6ona/OTJjH4ayam1Z+2ylp6dZOgJWVt7yJjb
PVmrnwoK799jaT/eMIwKUaHOHw6u66qZ1Qt8JXtodUQ3uA/jvdQTsdCdHG2/JDQy
Gm0JjJ/ZFYbPAW8wH9IXTKMe5ZW6zxTOmc1ccIvuW0xCOLminDe8I=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*r:NNFMP, asks, tracker, H*M:JavaMail
X-HELO: nh604-vm11.bullet.mail.ssk.yahoo.co.jp
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1551830306; s=yj20110701; d=yahoo.co.jp; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=nZEMWCXOuCa7I6S9AvWF4G+Nnt3sMYcIh7wum79F6lc=; b=OzGXTCrgN+hM+SzvJ42h+RKoUUFF7NpGgeKPTj+sjuS3WP6gEpDH7Gwrfq6FoN4d P79ziiACFB2BkiLvSsi1u5ejXYdSsU/Q5l7fdILo7SdIQmo2EhF93Y+NSmEUQqBKc+7 +ly+IMArxweCJMKDMw/O8WszQ2/OW7cC8+W6CHh0=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=yj20110701; d=yahoo.co.jp; h=Date:From:Reply-To:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Ph0VtluKWiljBRHPJbHU/V5geqGINK0GOKbc1mdfjy3x/gKpSJviV5mCoiT8kyZs X1UzpkdO6ODbiWR9QTHrpVqDZFTV/bfKGT4DncqhY9C7ZUtiszCehX6eZj8+RLEgu9T Tyny8g1mcpgIW/V4+stqmqk8ggWFlPsOe3MGOoyQ=;
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2019 08:58:25 +0900 (JST)
From: Tatsuro MATSUOKA <tmacchant2 AT yahoo DOT co DOT jp>
Reply-To: Tatsuro MATSUOKA <matsuoka AT nuce DOT nagoya-u DOT ac DOT jp>
To: Achim Gratz <Stromeko AT nexgo DOT de>, <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Message-ID: <765948088.2262341.1551830305348.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.co.jp>
In-Reply-To: <87d0n586qw.fsf@Rainer.invalid>
References: <1439412702 DOT 1866573 DOT 1551653028041 DOT JavaMail DOT yahoo DOT ref AT mail DOT yahoo DOT co DOT jp> <1439412702 DOT 1866573 DOT 1551653028041 DOT JavaMail DOT yahoo AT mail DOT yahoo DOT co DOT jp> <0faa5fb55a0af4803fcdff786dba8be440355609 DOT camel AT cygwin DOT com> <1885179468 DOT 2217358 DOT 1551790639928 DOT JavaMail DOT yahoo AT mail DOT yahoo DOT co DOT jp> <87d0n586qw DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid>
Subject: Re: Patch request to qt 5.9.4 (Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Qt 5.9.4)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id x25Nwgij020193

> From: Achim Gratz

> To: cygwin
> Cc: 
> Date: 2019/3/6, Wed 04:24
> Subject: Re: Patch request to qt 5.9.4 (Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Qt 5.9.4)
> 
>T atsuro MATSUOKA writes:
>>  I contacted with Enrico who tells me the patch that I have shown.
> 
> Yes, but that monkeys around the real problem.  What Yaakov is telling
> you is that there are two options and we don't know yet which one we
> have to deal with.
> 
> If O_NONBLOCK is needed, but does not work correctly under Cygwin, then
> that's a bug in Cygwin.  For this case, Corinna asks you to create an
> STC that demonstrates the bug so it can be triaged without having to
> work with something as complex as the Qt terminal in Cygwin.
> 
> If on the other hand O_NONBLOCK is in fact not needed and just shows
> different behaviour on different systems without a bug in the
> implementation being present, then upstream should remove that argument.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Achim.

Here I desribe another discussion on Bug tracker on gnuplot
https://sourceforge.net/p/gnuplot/bugs/2147/



My summary from searching through the history shown in the links above:
	* gnuplot calls QLocalSocket::connectToServer("name")
	* Qt tries to open a named pipe for the socket using O_NONBLOCK
	* This fails because Cygwin has problems with non-blocking named 
pipes. Back in 2010 Enrico Forestieri posted some simple examples of 
this (standalone tests, no involvement of gnuplot code) but this 
apparently did not lead to a fix. 
	* the Qt patch at the head of this bug report would make gnuplot work, but needs to be wrapped in a conditional test for CYGWIN. I can 
understand why upstream Qt would not want to deal with this. 
Conclusion:  We probably can't fix it in the gnuplot code.  There is a trivial work-around that requires modifying the Qt source code, but 
this would only make sense for the purpose of making a Qt package 
specifically for Cygwin. 

Tatsuro


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple


- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019