delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
DomainKey-Signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id |
:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post | |
:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc | |
:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type | |
:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=P5Q1PMATwTtbuZN4 | |
J0e8eOwh+lwBg350fvrQaMBKJbRN1q7fd0FjT3Dcd9Tln0SjisORsKov6Oq/dtRg | |
cjeecB/ORWRbhggkA/Y/DtUcQyCJI/ptK3CUDfAYFm/EGGnz7oxDrKicpw4hismL | |
1nqF31qH1sOrpIImCgd7gJ0XW3Y= | |
DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id |
:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post | |
:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc | |
:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type | |
:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=gM9obGSvTtGJoJhpPJBlSu | |
tJ+98=; b=oPRuHE2bMNbnHMl8tibjEXkg71SV7jn6ppF12M7Ti6dMg7JQekcDiX | |
E0MQGRTbC5iGhfaSmp0WzPcv9lmR33KavKD4f7VM0CEUesfsJEvSfCmFO4+gW23N | |
88kjrGKdyt5RXDMzwb40p8UNS4LsKhJyihWayMW69pwQs1+n+W86s= | |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Authentication-Results: | sourceware.org; auth=none |
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: | No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,GIT_PATCH_2 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=handheld, sessions, Yeah, thinks |
X-HELO: | Ishtar.sc.tlinx.org |
Message-ID: | <5C74E202.3010306@tlinx.org> |
Date: | Mon, 25 Feb 2019 22:51:46 -0800 |
From: | L A Walsh <cygwin AT tlinx DOT org> |
User-Agent: | Thunderbird |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | =?UTF-8?B?UmVuw6kgQmVyYmVy?= <rene DOT berber AT gmail DOT com>, mikebrady AT eircom DOT net |
CC: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: Question about D-Bus and cygrunsrv |
References: | <287EA5C9-AEDB-417D-8E1D-29405AB24325 AT eircom DOT net> <23766B16-3812-4D94-AA7C-C61C167A05C9 AT eircom DOT net> <20190222095525 DOT GN4256 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <q4psb6$4h1q$1 AT blaine DOT gmane DOT org> |
In-Reply-To: | <q4psb6$4h1q$1@blaine.gmane.org> |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
On 2/22/2019 2:16 PM, René Berber wrote: > > > My guess is that its a permission problem: D-Bus by default on Windows > uses unix sockets (fills up your temp directory with those pesky files : > - -) > > In Cygwin the temp directory has the sticky permission (t), but the > socket file created by the server most likely doesn't have access for > anybody else. > --- I'm not sure, but I'd think dbus demon would be enabled to talk to the system socket > Check those permissions to maybe get a clue. > > The problem comes from upstream, I'm just not sure because I used to > build my own, patched, version of DBUS (for a workaround which is to > use tcp, not unix sockets... but the Windows maintainer says "nobody > uses tcp sockets on Windows", and then they "improved" security which > is why I suspect access permissions). > --- Yeah, they are more than a little bit security paranoid. I'd like to get the dbus sessions between my desktop & server to talk -- like when I am running an X-app, and press help, it really would be better if it brought up the browser on my desktop instead of one on the server via X. I had hopes as one of their examples specifies tcp in the protocol field, but supposedly the tcp doesn't work and likely won't due to security concerns -- mainly because the bus architecture was structured around the idea of an internal HW bus -- where normally there isn't much in the way of security. If they allowed it to be open to a network, then they think everyone on the internet will have access and that dbus will be blaimed for a security problem. I did mention that some people use closed nets between machines and should be allowed to use dbus to talk between them where desirable, but he thinks that most hand-held users wouldn't know how to isolate a net. On top of that, dbus doesn't have the ability to categorize if the net is public, private(home) or enterprise(work). Seemed like a pain to get working for what would be a plus for me, but not sure about demand, not to mention working with such paranoid folk really can be frustrating. There's a dbus list where they talk about development and security issues @ https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dbus best of luck! -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |