X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=pP8JxlPcAdv25dC2
	ZCbgNvY7CWd432xJe/VhJmkBBsrLyjiNYkKCRmhIbBAc2J5J/dFOW49dRd5L3vti
	j91bL2wzMitk/ErBLrwmS2XFgPSkK5nkVMYMmgBqGYiVV5YlN9yb7xke0fPMy/M6
	yjQpVBGKQjAPtkej+bltR6+8kpg=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=UHwIITNyh/GEXaWevPFZQ3
	/7w00=; b=cvztjTubNjBcpReE9WHkTkeFZea81aTJlWsbeDYCZc8hP5NjYkH3Vn
	lftAgxxDVgJkSJMvRgM/n5QTif5Vd86F5ZPgaoCl3ETZzGj8rLdRdgwR9fQYgZ1u
	oZDxVJF8sGuSDOqFVflRUATdAL5s+4uUXiIr9+cEo2Ai0Bj0JNuXw=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=1.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,FOREIGN_BODY,FREEMAIL_FROM,GIT_PATCH_2,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=auf, diese, UD:avast.com, wwwavastcom
X-HELO:	mail-wr1-f41.google.com
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qjKl4y9dDraIyxLbTiEXcl4+S785JowGQJBf68Im5Kc=; b=DMcyHH79uAJ5p01p98CFTMlRJIfd1i464s8sOrQxbvXBG0oG2kCv2HewY6aHAwEvJ2 Nkp0N6m6M4GgU63wfekrOctryj/Wn+pZ9kIxi7qRUFFSvwBYrReC2R+pJLt5VivRq4Sp mLcr6VlTw2v7JgbmgL4Y49bEdjnAiO83iiiZA5vvaEqqkj7Izddll0dWj5ETMuOfXpAj SltgPRC8mRs5btrC/W2uEI+7poYZKJ2ZdH+YblaHW4+Rlv8MDihTZ3rW+4NxKP/Ow/1a MZBsNQ8KybVU4k0ckUoiX0flOcAo4mfe78ZaWxGfzcGk1jGinQ1dd0yw/2oGGceo4iBN OL5g==
Subject:	Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: ImageMagick-6.9.9.11-1
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20180909184848 DOT 09A6 DOT 50F79699 AT gmail DOT com> <1fd00112-4933-75cc-9598-e773276038c8 AT gmail DOT com> <20180910232311 DOT F78C DOT 50F79699 AT gmail DOT com>
From:	Marco Atzeri <marco DOT atzeri AT gmail DOT com>
Message-ID:	<817ae5f8-55e3-3f6e-703a-5fa6d90f5c59@gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 10 Sep 2018 16:55:24 +0200
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20180910232311.F78C.50F79699@gmail.com>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id w8AEtdmW025385

Am 10.09.2018 um 16:23 schrieb Lemures Lemniscati:
> Sorry I've missent a mail privately, again.
> Now posting to the ML...
>
>> Am 09.09.2018 um 11:48 schrieb Lemures Lemniscati:
>>> Thank you for maintainers.
>>> I apologize for bothering you.
>>>
>>> Reporting about cases:
>>>     ImageMagick 6.9.9-11 has an issue,
>>>     ImageMagick 6.9.10-11 resolves it,
>>
>> I can confirm this at least for x86_64, but the annoying thing is that
>> it will cause another API bump.
>>
>>>     ImageMagick 7.0.8-11 resolves it,
>>
>> we have decided to not move yet to 7.x
>>
>>> and hoping the current package ImageMagick-6.9.9.11-3 will be updated.
>>
>> I put it in the TODO list.
>>
>> Regards
>> Marco
>
> Thank you, Marco!
>
> I made a modified cygport file from 6.9.10.11-3-src:

I have already built it for both arch

> (2) Renaming
>
>    libMagickCore6_5 -> libMagickCore6_6
>    libMagickWand6_5 -> libMagickWand6_6

that is the annoying API bump, plus the circular
dependency with autotrace that need also to be re-built


>
> (3) Removing
>
>    PATCH_URI="AC_CHECK_SIZEOF.patch"
>
> Though I don't know whether AC_CHECK_SIZEOF.patch is necessary,
> packages seem to be built successfully without it.
>

the lack of proper [] escape of autoconf variable
gave me problem in the past so I maintain it by default.

> Attached a patch file for an example.
> Is it acceptable?
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Lemures Lemniscati


Thanks but not needed,
I just completed all the cross check and the autotrace rebuild

Regards
Marco


---
Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast Antivirus-Software auf Viren geprüft.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -