X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id:references
	:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding
	:mime-version; q=dns; s=default; b=BgA8eMTMbyu86avh0gYjuUOJe5160
	P/31LSipSSHffEg8qGEoMHrnGQIKIgqp1BPLaQrhfK/e/j5KEK0+tEeH65MSLeYe
	9p1/ZkFeTub/W6q6txrqNqDYRhoVgBnhrrMpjC/5WAe8XkZcdP+b9zWpPBNFKBAr
	P9MvCwVNEWdBvs=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id:references
	:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding
	:mime-version; s=default; bh=glJNxoVwWD+VE6lOQAKKmxOntYw=; b=QKn
	kyG/H8YPFng12K6FhYAGCfpDQweVkrEHp18AEUHq5n5mqpEjLC+7liswgURdN1K+
	nt4Tqdb08eUctm9G3/HMXqX1pXtVNu7p1BrO9CzyrHt7QUsmjD9s9n53L9XhhAG3
	GHXA/JcYk2oBJWujlnGH+0IKhAOCS5r9y84nm3T0=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*MI:sk:2018090, bryphe, H*i:sk:2018090, exercises
X-HELO:	NAM03-DM3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outlook.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=w/z9uVK1GCA3tS3oneKcCADb86Eh0yKP1sp4UKtR98k=; b=NfdRf3GPzmsKGO1LER69CzmG1UyUSO4v9DPbVjuYClRTdr8THJMG1BHqBdiJGI5Sguz64u+m/xV9jlNw5JENr7sFuLRajuYn5fq13nY8ury5T3cd8UsylnFNBLaNUiFll6ULtrP8MLR44sqe2A2SfFNasWE59qisERhw6cYsldEKObFoPQJdhnVBr0OvErx9vnhlHa9dRNkXttaFjxmnp2ccjedzYt/Tb6KeYa3J0tvtQ8MNgXAiEuRLSUW97FR0LQ9Puk8cCD2tqfgkTyiACKwGAViy+jVBbSnmJ29lwUV/iRWaoUdRtwiw4axMrTxufcUTB3LXmQmwNGv2pCQMaw==
From:	Bryan Phelps <bryphe AT outlook DOT com>
To:	"cygwin AT cygwin DOT com" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Bug Report: Regression in Cygwin 2.11.0-1
Date:	Sat, 1 Sep 2018 20:08:01 +0000
Message-ID:	<BL2PR16MB096188578C751002BF54F8E5C80E0@BL2PR16MB0961.namprd16.prod.outlook.com>
References:	<20180901155435 DOT GL6350 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
In-Reply-To:	<20180901155435.GL6350@calimero.vinschen.de>
received-spf:	None (protection.outlook.com: outlook.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
authentication-results:	spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=bryphe AT outlook DOT com;
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id w81K8FpO010794

> As for the bug in question:  I pushed a patch which should fix this 
> issue.  I created new developer snapshots and uploaded them to 
> https://cygwin.com/snapshots/.  Please give them a try. 

Thank you Corinna for the quick fix and investigation!

I set up an environment to test it out: https://github.com/bryphe/test-ocaml-build and ran a build against the patched dll.
It looks like the patch fixes our scenario - the build is green with the patched dll: https://ci.appveyor.com/project/bryphe/test-ocaml-build, so the patch fixes our problem.

> On the other hand, those that will find problems, the people building
packages, will only do that on "official" releases.

I'm pretty new to the Cygwin ecosystem - we could certainly create nightly builds that test against cygwin releases, if that helps (and adjust our CLI script to grab the nightly / latest test release of Cygwin).

I wonder if, for a change like this, we could add a test case that exercises it - looking through the source, it looks like cygload.cc has a few test cases around pathing - perhaps it would be helpful to add a regression test for the minimal repro?

Thanks again for the help and investigation!
Bryan
--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -