X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=tsROKh6CPbfI/sgqbC3K4etjKNhgRe5BPQDqPmNExdCbFU4+Ma6jW
	uhUBrEYaWdzc0B2MwgnXE/X1XLufHuyoc1/byYp8itdI1Vv+Dx1IjHF5+PF/Sp4k
	JJcRNv78cH0bLTd+T0p3I5AOptuvyg1tKSm73h5SgJiOneRirs3Uu0=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default;
	bh=0BBl2oRwqadTIB8rpc2rFqh8CQU=; b=Fs4trxvuBp7sBlfx6/neoKCyOGwK
	/XW1JLSLF4QCFNY/MRvbOv+ts+X3QhAlkbM7HN+o29Mue79IFlphSidJ8K8IoxN5
	04wp/ZHBlYRUBTct/FTXLNLOsZQlOfVbA48i4Q29NO0WWnedTViVdRGW263ToO/m
	O8mngTpzK6H/HZ8=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-101.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,GOOD_FROM_CORINNA_CYGWIN,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=accounts, reserved
X-HELO:	mout.kundenserver.de
Date:	Thu, 23 Aug 2018 10:11:35 +0200
From:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: incompat in cygwin choice of using '+' as domain and user separator.
Message-ID:	<20180823081135.GN3348@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<5B7DE56E DOT 6060109 AT tlinx DOT org>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<5B7DE56E.6060109@tlinx.org>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15)

--pZs/OQEoSSbxGlYw
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Aug 22 15:36, L A Walsh wrote:
> Ran in to this trying to use tar to store acls and xattrs:
>=20
> >  tar caf lawbins.tar scripts scripts- bin
> tar: miner.js: Warning: Cannot acl_to_text: Invalid argument
> tar: run-crons.sys: Warning: Cannot acl_to_text: Invalid argument
> tar: smallprof.out: Warning: Cannot acl_to_text: Invalid argument
> tar: tmon.out: Warning: Cannot acl_to_text: Invalid argument
> tar: ubytes_to_utf8.new: Warning: Cannot acl_to_text: Invalid argument
>=20
> examining one of these:
>=20
> >  find bin -name tmon.out
> bin/tmon.out
>=20
> >  lsacl bin/tmon.out
> [u::rwx,g::rwx,o:r-x,u:Unknown+User:rwx,g:Unknown+Group:rwx,g:Administrat=
ors:rwx,g:Bliss\Domain
> Admins:rwx,m:rwx/] bin/tmon.out

lsacl?  I don't know this tool.  The fact that it prints the unknown
accounts with '+' and the known account with '\' is weird.  This
shouldn't happen.  It should print all accounts with a '+'.  Please use
`getfacl' to examine the ACLs.

>=20
> I tried tar in an existing dir:
>=20
> >  mkdir test
> >  tar caf test.tar test
> >  ll test
> total 0
> >  cd test
> >  tar xaf ../test.tar
> >  ll
> total 0
> drwxrwxr-x+ 1 0 Aug 22 15:26 test/
> >  lsacl test
> [u::rwx,g::rwx,g:Bliss\lawgroup:rwx,g:Bliss\Domain Admins:rwx,m:rwx,o:r-x/
> u::rwx,g::rwx,g:Bliss\lawgroup:rwx,g:Bliss\Domain Admins:rwx,m:rwx,o:r-x]
> test
>=20
> With the above and only standard separator chars, no problem
>=20
> I'm guessing, but '+' is a reserved char that's not permitted in
> acl_to_text...

No, that's a wrong assumption.  Think about it.  The ACL given to
acl_to_text is the binary form, so it doesn't contain user or group
names, only uids and gids.  The usernames are only generated in the
output.

EINVAL from acl_to_text means the incoming acl is invalid.  Either it's
so broken that acl_to_text crashes, or it'sa NULL pointer, or it has
less then MIN_ACL_ENTRIES (3) entry, or it has more than MAX_ACL_ENTRIES
(2730) entries, or it doesn't follow the required rules for POSIX ACLs.

I assume the latter is the case here.  *Why* this occurs, I can't
tell.  I'd need a simple, reproducible testcase for that.


Corinna

--=20
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--pZs/OQEoSSbxGlYw
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=11DJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--pZs/OQEoSSbxGlYw--

- Raw text -