X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=mr8nUmEB9XeIFAci
	k8L+E1MYqtN85iSwRnFCjk10O9y+DPd4yWI7HcsfKp37xDwDvVCnhmhidrrZhgqt
	ehBTv7mzT99/Xdwqka3m253P+SNfWM0K8xsfYsm7v6Gi0+Ps2SIivEsaUH5IcIWM
	Vo2BkTLNedd0XKW+NGJSVMQ/tNY=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=tvABIAS962NKBvFVFb27h5
	O21YE=; b=BP/dCbC1B97lnj2TotipJxYH9MiD3lXvF+qIKQX8H8dLPtaW+VlRwV
	hAOsvwy7c3gTo/uAqmMyHRIRdmgSxFO5fX1RWREwE0/fvXwm1DHAVi5cttAQvVuG
	oyxUV7kBjLZ9FzoRY3mm35m/mWm1vi/LH7TGv6nRFwQ9gaeErQJWI=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=realize, entertain, questionable, youd
X-HELO:	mail-it0-f52.google.com
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:openpgp:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=B+YCj8vcFfQ1dpSESQ1DhW6A/9+sOW6+xefw+92uHEY=; b=py2qpGaFwUubcsbq+A63BwOTYAawkxI3BRZcabq5yCbaPfYn6FrpXjhW1H+kxrkzIx BF1DnHqOfJCRq+NEIDnJVgeW6mgbWpHXMp5c8FKPnu0Is4LI3Z1KTZB214ApsXIcI1hQ Pe6HoP5HiwRadWU2sh6mNPZUyMVpS3TMEfPQ04BgNEDh5cKepYqpgdgS4ojsS9/4aOJo +wVkxggSrel6PsK3wHX5JnIwEEpUb/9GIoSNW5KEAyT0ns+G6AecoEJl+5qj1H7JmfKZ FajaYlLF9aaBK7Ba1f3WJbVWwkGrDJbH+zP4nxlwHDUOBKpsb9jkx9OQIGVgS9SBXVog 6zNA==
Subject:	Re: cygserver - /usr/sbin vs /usr/bin
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<99a59fea-d5a6-a4ed-dca4-0772dd3fbf05 AT gmail DOT com> <20180813074957 DOT GF3747 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <b208313e-333f-53c5-acd2-eafe78fced6b AT gmail DOT com> <20180813144158 DOT GM3747 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
From:	cyg Simple <cygsimple AT gmail DOT com>
Openpgp:	preference=signencrypt
Message-ID:	<f0c86634-a16f-0c63-dcaf-6e0e6a6bba50@gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 14 Aug 2018 16:05:47 -0400
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20180813144158.GM3747@calimero.vinschen.de>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

On 8/13/2018 10:41 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Aug 13 08:50, cyg Simple wrote:
>> On 8/13/2018 3:49 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>> On Aug 10 11:28, cyg Simple wrote:
>>>> Looking at the files delivered by the cygwin upgrade I see
>>>> /usr/sbin/cygserver.exe and /usr/bin/cygserver-config.  Shouldn't
>>>> cygserver-config reside in /usr/sbin with cygserver.exe?
>>>>
>>
>> You didn't answer this with your below answer.  The cygserver-config
>> requires administrator privilege so it would be better placed with
>> cygserver.exe in sbin, IMO.
>>
>>>> Also in that vain shouldn't cyglsa belong in /usr/sbin?
>>>
>>> Nope.  /usr/bin is where the DLLs are, so they can be found
>>> even if PATH isn't set up.
>>>
>>
>> But cyglsa{,64}.dll is a standalone without any other binary.  It is
>> only accessed by the OS for the LSA support if the registry key exists.
>> This means the cyglsa-config can be modified to point to the sbin
>> directory instead of the bin directory.  Again administrator privilege
>> is required so better placed in sbin, IMO.
> 
> cyglsa.dll requires an install script that would have to be change as
> well.  In contrast, you'd have to make sure your new solution still
> works for existing installations.  What's the gain?  Does it *hurt* to
> have the stuff in /usr/bin like everything else?
> 

No but then why have cygserver.exe in /usr/sbin?  Either there should be
a separation because of required administrative rights or there
shouldn't be at all.  Having it both ways is just confusing even if the
confusion isn't apparent to you.

> If you want trhis questionable changes desperately, feel free to provide
> patches on the cygwin-patches ML.
> 

When I feel that the answers to my question have been thought out I
would entertain a patch to cygwin-patches.  I realize the cyglsa-config
script requires a change should cyglsa*.dll moves and an update option
would need to be provided for those who have configured it already.

-- 
cyg Simple

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -