X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:from:to:subject:references:date:in-reply-to
	:message-id:mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=icGgD
	eoG7tHRpL64U4r9eR7V2aKiFFUwa/OQVz12i5ZnfRCmjJXxxi5eMmGWasEHndx+9
	AuAyjdw4ESAOldXICw5qXQYcN1IpuswZOVkpeobiXuCAD21174AzSrBp4cAeDSfr
	eYt9NBbMlAjb1gOy5NkpDvb4w3OCRvIoB9t7xg=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:from:to:subject:references:date:in-reply-to
	:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=default; bh=jLpMnKbYggJ
	lQl3zyFhAwXV62x0=; b=dCvCWrtb2Sv6hWy+mvSAB9Y/nTDIN2QuHBph1WzfSTQ
	/c7fubPKquF2lkeySq8EoU/C23AEMYlMD18bBqIpZOkzCpx+jwtRwKb7nUKs7S6X
	YbKLIvi0Q9Br4crIg4g/e/EnPNfxBWLLtgdgA/1tL2WRFu0A5JuRXTKMJTcdF/FU
	=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-spam-relays-external:ESMTPA
X-HELO:	vsmx012.vodafonemail.xion.oxcs.net
From:	Achim Gratz <Stromeko AT nexgo DOT de>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: strtod ("nan") returns negative NaN
References:	<CANnLRdii8mX71D936AhhEYm+S0s4gS5RGgpPhV_rB6=kzmXKsw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20180814 DOT 100952 DOT 1684125661222835312 DOT trueroad AT trueroad DOT jp> <20180814 DOT 113135 DOT 1571893395887584078 DOT trueroad AT trueroad DOT jp> <20180814 DOT 134527 DOT 917341694729989717 DOT trueroad AT trueroad DOT jp> <20180814095618 DOT GT3747 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20180814103900 DOT GU3747 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
Date:	Tue, 14 Aug 2018 21:24:05 +0200
In-Reply-To:	<20180814103900.GU3747@calimero.vinschen.de> (Corinna Vinschen's message of "Tue, 14 Aug 2018 12:39:00 +0200")
Message-ID:	<87lg98eoq2.fsf@Rainer.invalid>
User-Agent:	Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version:	1.0

Corinna Vinschen writes:
> With your patch, strtold looks more correct, but it still prints the
> sign of NaN:
>
>   strtod ("nan", NULL) = nan
>   strtod ("-nan", NULL) = nan
>   strtold ("nan", NULL) = nan
>   strtold ("-nan", NULL) = -nan
>   nan ("") = nan
>
> Question: What's wrong with that?  Wouldn't it be more correct if
> strtod returns -NaN for "-nan" as well?

That's iffy, the treatment of sign bits for NaN is quite different from
the usual arithmetic rules.  A NaN is literally "not a number", i.e. the
computation has left the domain of representable FP numbers, so it
really doesn't have a sign.  That doesn't stop folks from using the sign
bit on its representation, but that's a different story.  The sign
properly belong to what is called the "payload", which is usally
ignored.  So converting "-nan" (or NaN multiplied by -1) really ought to
be just plain NaN.


Regards,
Achim.
-- 
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+

Factory and User Sound Singles for Waldorf rackAttack:
http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSounds

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -