X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
	:message-id:subject:to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=v/KjQFC
	XeJv0Q8jiDCpeEmANBhpepsgkIR2oU8KIyGV2zwdpq9dWQBgbs04l7ZpAR0dHnHm
	FUEX4+j/uXj+97npdDaqS2NTtFPFC8JLMb5fM2M0vwDBYXv0/dvy8UxkGhRTZ7ou
	kmwDMQCry3CL8sbqSg5xavebyjIhYmy1Es1M=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
	:message-id:subject:to:content-type; s=default; bh=K6G0OpZvBtPOC
	qnU6F6pq/5Ej60=; b=b9vQObXV/abh7u5UxkmMcp/dz+PeHK701RTahkwi2UkDc
	YRSwm0BOWGzJ2mgc1QWWJv9qdkh9d3U5IztICqRlBHqxmXQ2r0L3BZNFmFSvDGi8
	J8jOJsLEvJj/uabmjJGdw5+kMl1I6Ozf7NZZZgIYTEGrU6NFC7h93RBcs5a/j0=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=
X-HELO:	mail-io0-f177.google.com
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=8f3CgmRXsiDzRQZpf5Wj639sCPU1q/5k8l9EyPCAQIY=; b=bjQAnSJ0c7xNm6L4DF86j1lgQBWOhZ+o0uWWTqC8uO80UFvg7lMkOXAnzNa4TZOHs5 gb2+6DJoqFOjKxPnI/LzP07n0ZOcEDFApP1WlXUMDHQTkKG9kVxMtsICw2H+sGAcnvuf CR3oW6QhKi0tcS0KS4QCYVACm1kxDjIaV+QT9Gi3wO04yIaoK2xeULF7IUyGz2tdIJhV fBOuVri7tJp3/nB83EjRXEjhq5xJ2+7U32AWtBtJTgtpiII8nLK707+4t5OptqKoK+oJ szElM3Gb8JXkh/WdBpipA9Utbebn0O30dbS78vf9G6PERnQfal1t/ycl8sZHjsf6FdQa hiUQ==
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<CAOC2fq-OZE1DvG_p1tcVpfJHD3x2rg2nmiY1ox8mAoVSEM3S7w@mail.gmail.com>
References:	<CAD8GWss253v-p+FjeonEqibr53v6wZRCQ+NWxBhb0LimQaM4sQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <1183751257 DOT 20180621042620 AT yandex DOT ru> <CAD8GWsuo3PuQSdSyMRhbxZQXa=GUSBcyes7QEaqDYfh3FCof0Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <5B3045B1 DOT 4080504 AT tlinx DOT org> <CAD8GWsuevQX6fBUzkEvUs5rBPehhG7-ht+FPZU=eOaACF5uCPg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAOC2fq-OZE1DvG_p1tcVpfJHD3x2rg2nmiY1ox8mAoVSEM3S7w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
From:	Lee <ler762 AT gmail DOT com>
Date:	Wed, 27 Jun 2018 02:53:38 -0400
Message-ID:	<CAD8GWstq3-ZZoXTewZA-HuBVnwR4uOQOn5LU4UoM3GjdgLYGKQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: UTF-8 character encoding
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

On 6/26/18, Michael Enright  wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 11:33 AM, Lee  wrote:
>> I'm still trying to figure utf-8 out, but it seems to me that 0x0 -
>> 0xff is part of the utf-8 encoding.
>
> I don't see how you arrived at this.

I screwed up trying to do hex in my head.  For whatever reason I
didn't want to write 0 - 127

> An initial byte of 0xFF is not
> the initial byte of any valid UTF-8 byte sequence. And it doesn't
> conform with the statement you have later:

right, I screwed up :)

> The standards such as IETF RFC-3629 are easy enough to read, so I
> recommend using them and citing them to others instead of trying to
> summarize.

Thanks for the RFC reference - I hadn't come across that one yet.

Lee

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -