X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
	:message-id:subject:to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=v1e25TG
	lCB2I5OzSNI4qnKKAjnPEwKmLNUIbKMrh6/VCSOjXl55VhA+aDuLhV/i95wvw9Hx
	YHAn9LuixWOx+Q9HMMAvwMZtETjm8iOmq4iotRHb6WejtWccQKRDbD+R2uZ6tMVG
	YGYqH3J1R8eJ3/KSDXd+vrXz+p+ty/LTfdes=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
	:message-id:subject:to:content-type; s=default; bh=cVwx7ttteyPbP
	Bn+PD7OPLTvYo4=; b=SF9RV77ZxHnem+ojEfmF0elMYLu5SEncTjMkbBZmPSPjz
	5SKZp0Sq+XgqovacKGcjC/CqXzCjZcBUC8AjpFBzMhIJwPPPfqpflI1CLjfFgtiB
	K9sbdU3Npn4RbyQcRPBPAzgPXOWmMnCtkaIp1LPUPkqapuO+V7fnoI4hhnFP7Q=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=Third, Distribution
X-HELO:	mail-io0-f174.google.com
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=WVtrYravQ8xDzZvJTekBa1xbM+tCjo80ua9b7CvMDAc=; b=kiRmnAT57NAmqwSPDUB/qEI7+SNg7kcnNRUB0mnJAGDOPas9s1nKUScCfSW5XFra5y PWo3oFNB+iuenAiZ7zDrIRhqh3Y5MQx2aJ11R6y+e2UVuh5jh654ZDs1aTaiuv0lED8r lu3uvDXfWiSZ81lrdS8KhEhXtiA4QlXE+td/BkeQxftabJdadRcma+P7nfPwcgJojgbK cSGzmkkWJpX42hdKa1HjaB9lrhco3Zjsd88Al9Asv8mXkP1aZilRAPDHooLJzrv+1uss QN0dKZF5Wa+j/BtaP+NjYiKl1mjpXhWCZqVSd/5urhAfv9f6bie8AwH/TpzdWfBmwVd5 uuzQ==
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<981ba1fe-7961-5ed0-e3c7-a5717af8c141@towo.net>
References:	<CAD8GWss253v-p+FjeonEqibr53v6wZRCQ+NWxBhb0LimQaM4sQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <1183751257 DOT 20180621042620 AT yandex DOT ru> <CAD8GWsuo3PuQSdSyMRhbxZQXa=GUSBcyes7QEaqDYfh3FCof0Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <5B3045B1 DOT 4080504 AT tlinx DOT org> <CAD8GWsuevQX6fBUzkEvUs5rBPehhG7-ht+FPZU=eOaACF5uCPg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <981ba1fe-7961-5ed0-e3c7-a5717af8c141 AT towo DOT net>
From:	Lee <ler762 AT gmail DOT com>
Date:	Wed, 27 Jun 2018 02:25:41 -0400
Message-ID:	<CAD8GWstSXHT0xFXbrzQNcOCdME7p2zRLSRffJe4BjhFuP48-Bw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: UTF-8 character encoding
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

On 6/26/18, Thomas Wolff  wrote:

> This encoding scheme is wrong; where did you get it from? Maybe it's the
> obsolete UTF-8...

http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/ucs/utf-8-history.txt

I thought I saw something about utf-8 being able to handle a 31 bit
value..  is that also obsolete/wrong?

how about this for the current encoding scheme:
http://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode11.0.0/ch03.pdf

Table 3-6.  UTF-8 Bit Distribution
Bits    Scalar Value               First Byte  Second Byte  Third Byte
 Fourth Byte
  7   00000000 0xxxxxxx            0xxxxxxx
 11   00000yyy yyxxxxxx            110yyyyy    10xxxxxx
 16   zzzzyyyy yyxxxxxx            1110zzzz    10yyyyyy     10xxxxxx
 21   000uuuuu zzzzyyyy yyxxxxxx   11110uuu    10uuzzzz     10yyyyyy    10xxxxxx

Lee

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -