X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=nCb7e6E6A2eMbWSt
	Tv4uMmnEWDwg+PZRzKSP1saOWBeVp2LRDxi5fc7esXYR948I15207kiA0R2pkjKg
	m7+nSFllVJSSQST+CWU2vya7VYwJctw7TY0gvPBBjBd5QgyyIMMtEIej8onsCUAa
	Qo9YyHpfos8cpuXjJtpHkb1RQzQ=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=i+DXkiis+SPNsb2Tlj/tb1
	pZytk=; b=h0UfUfaGyWK+HTtKg+vMx28fO+xQjLRUGqntmfKONaCYn3s6kVToTs
	+/EfXu3bQe4sITWjMMp00Kd6Hvwfiu5Bh48MlSdj4x1KMz9Q8ujd2ZJQMUpu04BL
	Y+V+FH88SnOGW6wq8/6pwAfjzHa2fKj4MJ4Vyv6tkDEMqJdojR0Z0=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,UNSUBSCRIBE_BODY autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=bulletin, penny, forth, H*Ad:U*frank
X-HELO:	midtown.nycx.com
Subject:	Re: My delayed complaint about spam on this list
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<CACoZoo22cgpXPUBPqnaUthNS64-+uvrx1uCw0PBZD9rTvWs1_A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <5b1724fa DOT 1c69fb81 DOT e68c1 DOT 159b AT mx DOT google DOT com>
From:	Frank Farance <frank AT farance DOT com>
Message-ID:	<dc60851c-b32c-cf6f-6ae0-0bbadf430818@farance.com>
Date:	Tue, 5 Jun 2018 20:18:59 -0400
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<5b1724fa.1c69fb81.e68c1.159b@mx.google.com>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

On 2018-06-05 20:04, Steven Penny wrote:
> [...]
> If OP is suggesting people can only reply if they are subscribed, then I am not a fan of that.

No, I'm not suggesting that one must be subscribed, I'm pointing out that if one wants to have a back and forth discussion (in a practical sense), some kinda registration/subscription system is necessary.  What I like about the present format of this list is: it's just E-mail, there aren't bulletin board web interfaces to forces the fragmentation of the discussion into separate threads, with cygwin I can see the discussion threads based upon Subject line.

Someone suggested a moderator (or multiple moderators) that would approve messages from outsiders.  That sounds like the easiest approach because it anyone can write to the list and there would be just a short delay for those people who aren't subscribers, but the main benefit would be the lack of spam.

I'm not tied to any technology, and I'm happy to have heard some more discussion, which better informed me about some of the Use Cases I was unaware of.

So here's my question (and it assumes that there would be volunteer(s) to moderate):

Question: "Would a moderation system work where subscribers could send messages directly, but non-subscribers would need a moderator to approve the message?"

If that is acceptable, then the next step would be to find a couple volunteers.

Your thoughts?

-FF

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -